|
|
|
|
Value Rating
Above Average
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article From Motor Trend Magazine
2002 Toyota Camry LE Automatic Vs. Toyota Camry SE Five-Speed
French Vanilla Takes On Cherry Vanilla In This Four-Cylinder Camry Comparo
By Bob Nagy
Photography by John Kiewicz
Though it seldom makes the short list for most die-hard enthusiast drivers, Toyota's ubiquitous Camry has long managed to exact the sweetest kind of revenge upon detractors and competitors alike. For the best part of a decade, this genuinely purposeful, relentlessly reliable, and heretofore blisteringly bland front-drive sedan has either led or challenged for the top spot in U.S. passenger-car sales. With its all-new fifth-generation offering, Toyota sought to push the envelope in yet another way, by bolstering the rational side of this hardy perennial with a well-measured infusion of style and performance. To better gauge the success of that mission on a grassroots level, we gathered two variations on the '02 theme: one, its volume leader; the other, its most affordably priced sport version. For those of you not up to speed on Camry obscura, we're talking the now-entry-level LE with a four-speed automatic transmission and the newly resurrected, sportily flavored SE model fitted with a five-speed manual. Both can be had with the carryover 3.0L V-6. However, since some 70 percent of all Camrys sold are four-cylinder models, and we've already tested the V-6, we ordered both with the new 2.4L DOHC four-cylinder base engine. Shared with the Highlander SUV, this lightweight, compact powerplant is one the most praiseworthy elements of the Gen V Camry's design brief. Smoothed by balance shafts and fortified with VVTi (Variable Valve Timing with Intelligence) on the intake side, it tops the old 2.2L four in both output and efficiency. Developing 157 hp and 162 lb-ft of torque-gains of 10 and 15 percent, respectively, over its predecessor-the new engine substantially improves the four-cylinder Camry experience, regardless of trim or transmission type. Equally notable, it nets budget-minded 24/33-mpg EPA marks when paired with the manual box and 24/32 mpg matched with the autoshifter. Before comparing empirical data, however, a quick player profile is in order. Expected to account for about half of all Camry sales, the LE now anchors the lineup following the departure of the slow-selling CE. Nearly three-quarters of LE buyers will pair the I-4 with Toyota's equally new, electronically controlled four-speed automatic transmission in a combo that starts at $19,800. Complementing the Camry's bigger and even-better-appointed passenger compartment is an impressive array of standards led by air-conditioning, power windows/locks/ mirrors, and cruise control. Our tester also had anti-lock brakes, side/side-curtain airbags, floormats, and Package 2 (keyless remote, power driver's seat, and premium sound system with CD), as well as the $830 autoshifter. It bottom-lined at $22,109, including destination. The SE level's exterior cosmetic touches include foglights and a rear spoiler. Inside, it nets unique fabric, leather-wrapped three-spoke steering wheel, brushed faux-metal accent trim, and titanium-face gauges. More important, the SE gets stiffer springs/shocks/anti-roll bars, higher-effort power steering, and 215/60VR16 performance tires in place of the LE's 205/65TR15 rubber. This one had the same extras as our LE plus alloy wheels, items that bumped its as-tested figure from $20,310 to $23,029.
|
Toyota Camry Means You Like Clay Aiken
How does one become qualified to be a “Dating Coach?†Is it a person who has been on a whole lot of dates? That...
06/23/2008 | 16:06 PM
|
|
Toyota Camry Turned Muscle Car In Aurion TRD
TRD. These three letters are as synonymous with performance as Subaru STi or even Mercedes AMG....
09/03/2007 | 18:09 PM
|
|
2008 Toyota Camry's $100 Brings More Packages, Value
July, 2007 - Torrance, CA - Toyota Motor Sales (TMS), U.S.A., Inc., announced manufacturer's suggested retail prices...
07/23/2007 | 21:07 PM
|
|
2007 Toyota Camry Hybrid 50th Anniversary Limited Edition
February 20, 2007 - Torrance, CA - Toyota Motor Sales (TMS), U.S.A., Inc., today announced manufacturer's suggested...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
2008 Toyota Camry takes on competition Down Under
In this three-way shootout by Sydney Morning Herald writer Joshua Dowling, the most popular midsize vehicle in the...
04/14/2008 | 21:04 PM
|
|
|
1996 Toyota Camry automatic transmission problem
I'm considering buying a 1996 Camry, 4-cyl. (2.2 L), automatic (about 175,000 miles). There is a problem with the...
11/12/2007 | 23:11 PM
|
|
|
99 Toyota Camry LE- whatcha think?
I think its a good bet, I had a 98 with 160,000 and it worked well up until this year when I traded it away for a...
10/16/2007 | 16:10 PM
|
|
|
99VW Beetle VS. 99 Toyota Camry LE
I am looking @ a 99 VW Beetle 74K new tires, breaks, & muffler and a Toyota Camry LE one owner fully equiped 93K, and...
10/17/2007 | 14:10 PM
|
|
|
For sale - Toyota Camry 2002.
GOOD Condition toyota camry 2002. Accident Free. low millege - 51000Km. silver, selling 58K. anytime handover....
07/23/2007 | 15:07 PM
|
|
|
Toyota Camry CD Radio FM Dial
I just bought a Tape for my Toyota Camry. It is a CD, Tape and Radio all in one. However, my FM band does not go beyond...
05/31/2007 | 06:05 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|