|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article From Motor Trend Magazine
2006 Motor Trend COTY Contender: 2006 Mercury Milan
Okay, so what's in a name?
By Editors of Motor Trend
Photography by John Kiewicz, Brian Vance, Evan Wollenberg
You've got to wonder what this car would be if Edsel were still in business as a class-step between Ford and Mercury. Ford Motor Company brought three entries on its CD3 midsize platform to our party (contrast that with Hyundai, which brought three all-new cars): the Fusion, the much fancier Lincoln Zephyr, and, in the middle but close to the Ford, the Milan. The Mercury looks more elegant, grown-up, and urbane than the Fusion, with a neater, better-integrated grille and with clean Euro-style LED taillamps in place of the Fusion's Focus-like rear lamps. The Milan and Fusion share the same standard four and optional V-6, similar handling dynamics--kind of fun at the limit, but still midsize-family-car-soft--and similarly poor brakes. Standard 16-inch wheels (optional on Fusion) and optional 17-inch wheels (not available on Fusion) provide the only difference in chassis setup. With a base price $1000 higher than the Fusion's, you also get a standard power driver's seat, with higher-quality cloth than the Ford's, and better trim (the satin-aluminum look is optional at no cost), including cloth door inserts in place of plastic, and a standard analog clock. The Milan Premier, available with the I-4 or V-6, includes leather seats of a quality Mercury says isn't available in the Ford. The differentiation works, at least to the extent that the Fusion has the blue-collar look appropriate for Ford, while the Milan comes off as more white-collar. You can zoot-up the interior with two-tone seats, if you're secure enough in your office job to wear a loud tie with the white shirt. If you're a banker, go with the single-tone interior and quietly announce your prosperity. The Fusion got the nod into the group of 10 finalists, and the Milan didn't because the Ford is a much higher-volume car. Otherwise, the Mercury is a more dapper Fusion, with a more inviting interior.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How American is enough?
The whole import-domestic classification has been an issue since the 80s or so (when every foreigner set up a plant...
02/10/2005 | 19:02 PM | GenderBender
|
|
|
|
|
|
What to lease. Help!
Franky, I'm shocked that you can get $200 per month payments on a roughly $20K car.If you're cross-shoping fords and...
04/30/2007 | 22:04 PM | joela
|
|
|
|
|
|