|
|
|
|
Value Rating
Below Average
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article From Motor Trend Magazine
2004 SUV of the Year Testing
This real-world testing helps divide the eight soft-roaders into two groups. The Nissan Murano, with a locking center differential, the Lexus RX 330, with adjustable air suspension and a rear-mounted camera good for backing down hills (but not when the sun is low enough to obliterate the view), and the Cadillac SRX, with computer-controlled traction based on steering and gearing, can handle more than bad weather. Tires still are key, though, and the SRX's rubber, which is neither serious for off-road nor serious for pavement performance, can't help it get past deep, loose sand. All-wheel drive on the remaining five provides no more than severe-weather capability. Most notably, the BMW X3 and the Infiniti FX are heavily biased toward sports-car-style dry-pavement handling. Their advantages over cars are parking-space-spotting ride height, room for mountain bikes, and enhanced traction for damp or snowy pavement.  Dodge Durango Rear Cargo Styling and Design Our SUV candidates come in three styling flavors: new-wave sleek, sporty wagon, and traditional upright. The ovoid Infiniti FX, Nissan Murano, Lexus RX 330, and softly boxy BMW X3 typify the first group. Transcending this lively, growing category are the beautifully styled Volkswagen Touareg and Porsche Cayenne, each with lyrical, zaftig lines and bright brushed-metal or chrome touches that are carlike in tone. Sporty-wagon vehicles generally have more cargo capacity than the first group, and some offer a small, but handy, third-row bench. These include the Cadillac SRX, Chrysler Pacifica, and Mitsubishi Endeavor. In the case of the SRX, Cadillac is solidifying its defiantly edgy, machine-age Art & Science visual signature. Several editors feel this edgy, spline-line styling is becoming more digestible. Others say the origami look hangs more comfortably on the longer length of the SRX versus the wedgier CTS sedan skeleton. Chrysler Pacifica's zeppelinlike aspect contrasts sharply with the SRX. The Pacifica is a sleek, six-passenger model that might steal driveway spots from premium all-wheel-drive minivans. It looks like a Chrysler van that's been wide-tracked, chopped, and channeled for a zoomy profile, without sacrificing too much interior volume. The Endeavor's look is a cross between the Chrysler's and Cadillac's. With only two seating rows, it's not as long and low-profile as the Pacifica or SRX. One staffer observes that, with its boldly chiseled fender arches, it suggests a leaner, next-gen version of the jaunty Jeep Grand Cherokee. The traditional-upright models, Rainier, XUV, Durango, and Armada, are large, towing and hauling beasts. They're the sheetmetal equivalent of denim coveralls: honest, tough, and ready for work. Each has a full frame, heavy-duty suspension, and standard or optional V-8 engine. If yanking a trailer while transporting a full complement of passengers and cargo is the game, these are the appropriate tools. Unlike the third-row seats in smaller truck-sporty vehicles, the third row in the Durango and Armada will accommodate large teens and adults. Only the Armada, with its Frank Gehry-esque abstract architectural styling, stretches this buttoned-down paradigm, avoiding a me-too Expedition or Tahoe look.
|
2008 Nissan Titan and Armada Get Priced
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (April 24, 2007) -- Nissan today announced pricing on two new 2008 vehicles, the Nissan Titan...
04/26/2007 | 17:04 PM
|
|
Nissan Pathfinder and Armada Get Marc Ecko'd at VIP Show
With SEMA just a few scant weeks away, news on other custom shops are coming out of the garage faster than teens from...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
2008 Nissan Changes - Altima (Sedan), Armada, Pathfinder
2008 Nissan Armada The substantial enhancements to the 2008 Armada include revised exterior styling, an upgraded...
07/02/2007 | 15:07 PM
|
|
2008 Nissan Armada, Pathfinder, Titan To Stomp Chicago
FARMINGTOM HILLS, Mich. (February, 2007) – Nissan North America, Inc. (NNA) previewed last week the new 2008 Nisan...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
Nissan prices 2007 SUVs, new Versa
NASHVILLE, Tenn. – Nissan North America, Inc. (NNA) announced this week the 2007 model year pricing for Frontier...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|