|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article From Motor Trend Magazine
2006 Truck Of The Year Road Test: 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
Back In The Game With A Fresh Face And Strong V-8
By Editors of Motor Trend
Photography by John Kiewicz, Brian Vance, Evan Wollenberg
Mitsu is promoting the Raider as the only import V-8 alternative for buyers who don't want a full-size truck. It's offered in a number of configurations, thanks in large part to sharing its underthings with the Dodge Dakota. Another in this year's clone of-the-year competition (the others being the Lincoln LT and Isuzu i280/i350), the Raider 4.7-liter V-8 and five-speed combination didn't perform as its displacement and cylinder number had us expecting, matching the Lincoln's last-place quarter-mile time (17.3 seconds). Maybe this shouldn't have been a surprise, as the engine offers only 10 more horsepower than the Isuzu 3.5-liter I-5 and 17 horses less than the Ridgeline's DOHC 3.5-liter V-6. It wasn't the smallest or lightest truck in our test, but it had the smallest payload capacity at 970 pounds. That works out to be 220 pounds less than the Isuzu's and over 500 pounds less than the Ridgeline's. All isn't doom and gloom for the Raider, however. The design surgery Mitsubishi performed to round the wheel arches and smooth the creases and corners, handsomely sets the Rader apart from the Dakota. Mitsubishi negotiated serious interior changes that resculpted the Dodge's blocky dash layout in favor of a more sloping, waterfall-type deck top. The result is more openness for front driver and passenger. Our test unit came equipped with the DuroCross option package that includes upgraded shocks, fender flares, big wheels and tires, and a host of stickers and labels. Ride balance and suspension tuning are well equipped to handle the higher-speed pavement twists as well as the Baja-style washboard ruts on our test loops.  Although the five-speed tranny likes to hunt on long hillclimbs, the dual upshift/kickdown second-gear strategy works well, technically turning this five-speed into a six-speed. Among these brand-engineered competitors, this execution was our favorite, injecting enough unique personality to distinguish it from the donor platform, while maintaining, or even improving on, the strengths of the original powertrain and chassis. This type of execution--solid, if not outstanding--will help Mitsu get back on track. (related content) 2006 Truck Of The Year Road Test: Truck-Hunting Season Opens This Year With All-New Rulebreakers - And Even Tougher Game. Get the Full 2006 Truck Of The Year Story Here! |
|
|
|
2006 Future Vehicle Forecast
Manufacturers love to keep us guessing. They try to keep secrets from us, and we fight tooth and nail to get the info out as soon as possible.
more
|
|
2006 Truck of the Year Test and Review
You could say trucks haven't changed much over the years. Today's trucks are smoother, quieter, more powerful, more efficient, more comfortable, and--yes--tougher. More versatile, too: You can pick 'n...
more
|
|
2006 Truck of the Year Test and Review
You could say trucks haven't changed much over the years. Today's trucks are smoother, quieter, more powerful, more efficient, more comfortable, and--yes--tougher. More versatile, too: You can pick 'n...
more
|
|
Hottest 50 Cars, Trucks, and SUVs for 2006
The new model year is upon us, bringing the darlings of the last auto show season to our local dealers and driveways. From show floor to showroom, these are the most promising new models.
more
|
|
|
|
|
|