|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
1996 Ford Explorer VS 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee - Battle of the American V-8 Sport/Utilities
| Instrumentation | | Instruments | Temp, tach, speedo, | Fuel, battery, tach | | | oil, battery, dual airbags, | speedo, oil, dual | | | digital clock | airbags, digital clock | | Warning lamps | Check gauges, | Fuel low, brake, | | | check engine, battery, | check gauges, | | | seatbelt, ABS, | check engine, cruise, | | | airbag, brake | seatbelt, ABS, airbag | | Performance And Test Data | | Acceleration, sec | | 0-30 mph | 3.0 | 2.5 | | 0-40 mph | 4.5 | 3.9 | | 0-50 mph | 6.5 | 6.0 | | 0-60 mph | 8.8 | 8.2 | | 0-70 mph | 11.8 | 11.1 | | 0-80 mph | 15.7 | 15.8 | | Standing quarter mile, | | sec @ mph | 16.9 @ 82.0 | 16.3 @ 82.6 | | Braking, ft | | 30-0 | 38 | 34 | | 60-0 | 150 | 134 | | Handling | | Lateral acceleration, g | NA | NA | | Speed through 600-ft | | | | slalom, mph | 60.4 | 59.5 | | Speedometer error | 30/27 | 30/28 | | Indicated/actual | 40/38 | 40/38 | | | 50/49 | 50/48 | | 60/59 | 60/58 | | Interior noise, dB | | Idling in neutral | 48 | 45 | | Steady 60 mph in top gear | 68 | 68 | | Fuel Economy | | EPA, city/hwy., mpg | 14/18 | 14/18 | | Est. range, city/hwy., miles | 294/378 | 322/414 | The intimacy of the compact Jeep interior is more like that of a personal luxury car than a sport/utility. Supremely comfortable for two, the Grand Cherokee lacks the spaciousness to accommodate five comfortably for very long. With nearly six inches more wheelbase length and over 11 inches more overall length, the Explorer enjoys a significant interior-volume advantage over the Grand Cherokee. Ford further exploits this edge with more useful gadgets. The adoption of a control-arm front suspension last year produced enough room for Ford to shoehorn in its classic 5.0-liter V-8 for '96. A special fan saves space between the radiator and engine, while the tubular exhaust headers sweep up and then down for clearance. Jeep's flagship shares its 5.2-liter Magnum V-8 with Dodge trucks and enjoys a 10-horsepower advantage over the Explorer's 5.0-liter engine. The Jeep's barrel-type intake manifold has equal-length runners delivering fuel into each intake port.
|
|
|
|
|