|
|
|
|
Value Rating
Above Average
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
Road Test: Two Pontiac GTO's for One Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG
$70 grand will get you one of these slick, luxury musclecoupes--or two of the other
By Matt Stone
Photography by John Kiewicz
Let's say you need a black suit. A decent piece that looks sharp and fits well can be had at your local haberdashery for $400-$500. But check out that Hugo Boss in the window. The fabric is rich, it drapes like it was custom-made for you, and the detailing is superb. Look at all the extra buttons! Hugo's a great label to slip into, as long as you don't mind popping a grand at minimum--and that's on sale. Are the higher product quality and designer brand cachet worth the doubled or tripled cost of going upmarket? Or are you spending twice as much to get only a little more?
Pontiac's new GTO and the Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG represent the automotive analogy to the black-suit dilemma. They come within a few inches and pounds of each other in every physical dimension. Both sides of this automotive Odd Couple seat four and have V-8 engines and rakish coupe profiles. Each aims to strike a balance with luxury, performance, and everyday useability. Like the Boss threads, the Mercedes has finer detailing and lots more buttons. But can we really head-to-head a handbuilt, nearly $80 grand (as equipped), limited-edition Mercedes AMG--against a Pontiac? Snapshot The Players Mercedes-Benz's fast and elegant CLK55 AMG bases for $71,920 and includes a ton of technology, creature features, and performance. Pontiac's reborn GTO offers a similar-size and similar-performing package that also comes well-equipped, but starts at just $33,495. The Game We compare these two seemingly incomparable cars to see how they're different and, just as important, how they're not. Can you get the same go for half the dough? | Well, why not? A run through the spec chart reveals that both machines cast about the same shadow. The GTO is 7.2 inches longer and rides on a 2.9-inch-longer wheelbase. The Pontiac is exactly four inches wider and a half inch lower. The Mercedes makes a bit better use of the footprint, however, as its trunk is larger and rear-seat ingress and egress are easier. Both players pack a solid punch. Mercedes's AMG subsidiary turns the standard CLK500 into the CLK55 by dispensing with the former's 302-horse, 5.0-liter V-8 in favor of a hand-assembled, 5.4-liter SOHC V-8 good for 362 horsepower. There is but one transmission choice: a high-tech, multimode five-speed manumatic (more trans talk later). Pontiac borrows its torque-rich 350-horsepower, 5.7-liter OHV V-8 from the standard Corvette and serves it backed either by a six-speed manual transmission or a conventional four-speed automatic. At 3725 pounds, the GTO has one pony per 10.6 of Pontiac. The Mercedes tips the scales at a barely lighter 3635 pounds, so its weight-to-power ratio is 10.0:1 even.
|
2007 Mercedes-Benz CLS 63 AMG and CLK 63 AMG
Just a few weeks after the R63 AMG world-premiere and the ML63 North American debut at the Chicago show, the AMG crew is adding two more 6.2-liter-powered race horses to the stable, in the form of the...
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class
The CLK is a juicy source of profits for Mercedes-Benz. It's marginally cheaper to produce than an identically equipped C-class sedan-with which the CLK shares its underpinnings-and yet it sells for a...
more
|
|
August 2007 Wallpaper Gallery
Includes wallpapers of the Infiniti G37, BMW 335, Mercedes-Benz CLK63 AMG Black Series, and other cars featured in the August 2007 issue of Motor Trend.
more
|
|
|
|
|
|