|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
Long Term Arrival: 2007 Kia Rondo EX
Mini-minivan or cute crossover?
By Allyson Harwood
Photography by Jessica Germiller
As the automotive scene evolves, it's getting harder find a neat, tidy category for every vehicle. This may have started with the minivan and sport/utility, but has continued from there with sport/utility trucks and, most recently, the crossover. Yet there's a new category, one that currently only contains two vehicles: the compact minivan-like crossover wagon. For 2007, the Kia Rondo joins the Mazda5 in this exclusive group. The Rondo is based on the Optima sedan platform. Like a minivan, it seats seven (five is the base passenger layout), but, unlike a minivan, it uses standard doors in all four spots instead of two sliding ones along the rear sides. The minivan/crossover was such a standout at the 2007 Car of the Year event we decided to add one to our long-term fleet. Our topline EX came equipped with the optional 2.7-liter V-6 backed by a five-speed automatic, both from the Optima. (The 162-horse, 2.4-liter I-4 is standard.) For those familiar with Kia's minivan, the interior is incredibly familiar and easy to learn. The EX trim level came with many of the features we wanted, such as power windows/doors, heated side mirrors, foglights, six airbags (including full-length side curtains), four-wheel discs with ABS, and Kia's stellar 10-year/100,000-mile warranty. Our only additions were the Leather Package ($1000), which also comes with heated front seats; the Premium Package ($1200) so we could get the power sunroof and Infinity audio system; and the third-row seat ($500). This brought the total cost to $23,495, an impressive bottom line for a would-be minivan competitor-and a terrific value. It wasn't long before editors racked up miles on the versatile Rondo. It's seen more than 5000 miles of highway in only two months, visiting Mammoth Lakes and northern Nevada, among other destinations. It's even been to the track, where the V-6 Rondo reached 60 mph in 8.9 seconds and finished the quarter mile in 16.8 at 83.3 mph. Braking was a respectable 132 feet from 60 mph. These numbers hold up well against its main competitor: The 2.3-liter inline-four-powered Mazda5 goes from 0 to 60 in 8.5 seconds, completes the quarter mile in 16.6 at 84.6 mph, and brakes from 60 in 137 feet. The Rondo could potentially lure buyers who are eyeing minivans and crossovers. We're looking forward to finding out if this vehicle is ready to handle the demanding needs of these shoppers. | Our Car: 2007 Kia Rondo EX | | Base Price | $20,795 | | Price as tested | $23,495 | | Vehicle layout | Front engine, FWD, 7-pass, 4-door minivan | | Engine | 2.7L/182-hp/182-lb-ft DOHC 24-valve V-6 | | Transmission | 5-speed automatic | | Curb weight (dist f/r) | 3705 lb (59/41%) | | Wheelbase | 106.3 in | | Length x width x height | 179.0 x 71.7 x 65.0 in | | 0-60 mph | 8.9 sec | | Quarter mile | 16.8 sec @ 83.3 mph | | Braking, 60-0 mph | 132 ft | | EPA city/hwy econ | 18/26 mph (2008 specification) | | CO2 emissions | 0.86 lb/mile | | Total mileage | 5170 | | Average fuel economy | 21.1 | | Unresolved problem area | None |
|
2007 Kia Rondo Challenges Ford Crown Victoria For Taxi King
NEW YORK, April 4, 2007 -- In honor of the 100th anniversary of the modern-day taxi in New York City, the all-new Kia...
04/23/2007 | 22:04 PM
|
|
2008 Autos waiting in the shadows for bargain hunters
We're certain that there are lists of the year’s most overlookedmovies, TV shows, books, singers, sports celebrities,...
04/08/2008 | 05:04 AM
|
|
SUVs And Crossovers Continue To Replace Minivan
Intellichoice and U.S. News & World Report teamed up to determined the traditional minivans' replacement: SUVs and,...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
Compact Car Market Currently Hot
If you are out pursuing the market right now for a small car, you should snap it up now because incentives are phasing...
06/12/2007 | 14:06 PM
|
|
Kia Sees Rising Sales For Month, Quarter
IRVINE, Calif., June 1, 2007 -- Kia Motors America (KMA) today announced its best May ever with sales of 28,494 units,...
06/04/2007 | 16:06 PM
|
|
|
Mazda 5 vs. Kia Rondo
joyridemymazdaThere's no doubt about it, Mazda 5 is better than Kia Rondo in all aspects....
07/12/2007 | 03:07 AM
|
Coming Soon...
There are no similar vehicles found for Kia Rondo, please check back again later.
|
|
|
|
|