|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
Fleet Update: 2007 Mercedes-Benz GL450
By Scott Mortara
Shortly after the Benz's arrival, back to the shop it went. Two of its tires had started slowly leaking down-about five pounds in a month. The shop found the tires had been punctured by nails; they made the repair, then mounted and balanced the tires. We'd also been having problems with the car's DVD system: The screens, positioned on the back side of the front-seat headrests, had stopped working, plus the player ate an editor's DVD. So at that same visit, the shop ran tests on the system and determined the rear audio/video unit needed rebooting. So far, the system is working just fine. MORE VOICES: Spent a recent weekend using the GL in full `family' mode. After a Saturday morning run to the mega-mart for groceries/supplies, it took only a push of the two conveniently mounted rear switches to drop the third-row power seats to make plenty of room for our haul. A hugely appreciated feature, especially given the contortions required to flatten seats in some other vehicles. The power up/down tailgate seems like overkill, though -- really, how hard is it to pull a nicely weighted door up or down?A long afternoon drive through traffic to Pasadena was eased by the rear-seat DVD system, which kept my daughter entertained with "Ice Age" while my wife and I listened to Sirius comedy up front. Nice that you can operate the rear entertainment system fully independently of the main audio setup and do so using only the controls in the rear, no intervention from parents required.Ride comfort is quite good and the powertrain moves the GL smoothly and quietly, though it was a bit shocking to note the 10-11 mpg fuel average displayed on the trip computer. The GL drives `small' for a vehicle with such interior spaciousness and the rear-view camera makes backing into a parking space a breeze.You'll pay for the privilege at the sales desk and at the pumps, but it's hard to imagine a more versatile, comfortable, roomy, capable machine than this big Benz. -Arthur St. Antoine Ah, so this is what flying a Lear Jet or Gulfstream V is like. Plenty of room, yet drives smaller. Plenty of power out of an efficient engine. Plenty of room without being a tank. Feels expensive, and makes you feel special when you ride in or drive it. Not crazy about the column shifter; I like the console-mounted, ergonomically shaped piece in the new X5 a lot better. But that's a smallish issue. Just can't believe how stupid, wasteful, and cartoonish this makes something like an H2 look, which isn't much less money. The Mercedes-Benz GL is the best three-row luxury/utility money can buy, and a worthy wearer of our Sport/Utility of The Year crown. -Matt Stone | 2007 Mercedes-Benz GL450 | | Total Mileage | 10,649 | | Average fuel econ | 14.8 mpg | | Unresolved problem areas | None | | Maintenance cost | None | | Normal-wear cost | None |
|
|
|
Newcomers: 2008 Mercedes-Benz GL550/ML550
Both the 2008 ML and GL550 benefit from 382 horsepower and 391 pound-feet, the torque peaking from 2800 to 4800 rpm, with similar fuel economy to the 335-horsepower, 4.6-liter V-8 GL and defunct 306-h...
more
|
|
Fleet Update: 2007 Mercedes-Benz GL450
On a drive home from the office, Truck Trend editor Mark Williams noticed the GL, with a little over 24,000 miles on its odometer, was emitting a noisy driveline whine.
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|