|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
Fleet Update: 2007 Toyota Camry Hybrid
By Scott Mortara
Our Camry astonishes all who drive it. One editor went 455 miles using under 11 gallons of gas-just over 41 mpg. That same editor crept along in bumper-to-bumper traffic in just electric mode; the gasoline engine never turned on. Very cool. Some feel the interior isn't quite what we've come to expect from Toyota; seems it saved a few bucks on materials. Although we're below the EPA numbers of 40/38 mpg city/highway, we're not that far off. Add the fact that this is a full-size sedan, capable of triple-digit speeds, all while averaging over 30 mpg--mighty impressive. OTHER VOICES: Not gonna bag too much on the Camry hybrid because, with the price of gas continuing to rise, it's great to have the option of a fuel-sipping midsize sedan. But driving the hybrid version of our COTY still feels a bit awkward. Like all Toyota hybrids, the brake grab is still noticeable. You instantly know this car sports a different drivetrain from other Camrys or other appliance-like sedans. Also, the CVT might be great for optimizing the hybrid-system's efficiency, but it's a bore to drive. The on/off power from the electric motor, in addition to the grabby brakes and CVT, makes it hard to drive this thing smoothly. Plus, there's no shortage of whirring noises from the hybrid system heard mostly when stopped at a traffic light. I also feel like the suspension is tuned with a Buick owner in mind; it feels soft and willowy. Can't help but feel the demographic this car is aimed at are those born right around the mid-century mark or earlier. Not sure this matches up with potential hybrid owners, but, then again, what senior citizen doesn't like to save money on purchased good, gasoline being no exception? -- Brian Vance It's been interesting to see how this hybrid has aged over the year or so we've had it. That tear in the driver-side door panel seems to be the only interior damage so far, but it's pretty noticeable. I still wonder if that was a fluke or if the cabin materials are more susceptible to rips and tears than other Toyotas. Seems like the brakes are overly touchy, but not all the time, making them unpredictable. The transition from electric motor to engine has gotten rougher over time and is especially noticeable in traffic. It used to be a smoother switch -- wonder what it's going to be like five, six, seven years down the line. (For that matter, how are hybrids going to hold up as used cars?) Otherwise, this is a comfortable commuter car and would make would-be Camry owners happy -- there isn't a strong feeling of compromise with this hybrid. -- Allyson Harwood | 2007 Toyota Camry Hybrid | | Total mileage | 17,391 | | Average fuel econ | 31.8 mpg | | Unresolved problem areas | None | | Maintenance cost | $51.03 (5K service); $83.39 (10K); $112.27 (15K) |
|
Toyota Camry Means You Like Clay Aiken
How does one become qualified to be a “Dating Coach?†Is it a person who has been on a whole lot of dates? That...
06/23/2008 | 16:06 PM
|
|
Toyota Camry Turned Muscle Car In Aurion TRD
TRD. These three letters are as synonymous with performance as Subaru STi or even Mercedes AMG....
09/03/2007 | 18:09 PM
|
|
2008 Toyota Camry's $100 Brings More Packages, Value
July, 2007 - Torrance, CA - Toyota Motor Sales (TMS), U.S.A., Inc., announced manufacturer's suggested retail prices...
07/23/2007 | 21:07 PM
|
|
2007 Toyota Camry Hybrid 50th Anniversary Limited Edition
February 20, 2007 - Torrance, CA - Toyota Motor Sales (TMS), U.S.A., Inc., today announced manufacturer's suggested...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
2008 Toyota Camry takes on competition Down Under
In this three-way shootout by Sydney Morning Herald writer Joshua Dowling, the most popular midsize vehicle in the...
04/14/2008 | 21:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Drive: 2007 Toyota Camry
Since introducing the Camry sedan in Japan in 1980, Toyota has sold more than 10 million worldwide, with over 6.5 million snapped up in the United States, the world's single largest market for the mod...
more
|
|
|
|
|
|