|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
Long Term Arrival: 2008 Mazda CX-9Decked out for the long haul / By Ron Kiino /
Article provided by: Motor Trend Magazine
Hot on the heels of winning Motor Trend's 2008 Sport/Utility of the Year title, not to mention a June 2007 comparison test in which it outgunned the Acura MDX and GMC Acadia, the Mazda CX-9 has joined our long-term fleet, poised to prove it can remain a staff favorite following a year of grueling service. So far, so good, as every staff member who's slid behind the wheel has opted for extended stays, evidenced by over 5400 miles on the odometer in less than two months of duty time. Of course, there's little not to love with the CX-9, especially in topline Grand Touring AWD guise, as is our tester. Dressed in elegant Liquid Platinum paint, our GT AWD, with a base price of $35,250, boasts a slew of nifty and luxurious features, including leather-trimmed seats, a Smart Card keyless-entry system, an eight-way power driver seat, electroluminescent gauges, rain-sensing wipers, and Xenon headlamps. Options? Naturally. We added a $2560 rear entertainment/Bose audio option (DVD player, nine-inch LCD, 296-watt 11-speaker Bose surround sound, audio and video auxiliary inputs, and in-dash six-CD changer), and a $2500 assistance package (nav, rearview camera, and power hatch), a $525 towing package (receiver hitch, wiring harness, heavy-duty transmission cooler, and radiator fan), a $430 Sirius Satellite Radio, and a $275 auto-dimming mirror with compass and HomeLink. All said and done, our CX-9's sticker swelled to $41,540.  Last June, when the CX-9 beat the Acura MDX and GMC Acadia, it was motivated by a 3.5-liter V-6 pumping out 263 horses and 249 pound-feet. Refined and robust, the 3.5 was no slow-poke, delivering 0 to 60 in 8.1 seconds and the quarter mile in 16.3 at 85.3 mph. Just the same, for 2008, Mazda enlarged the CX-9's V-6 to 3.7 liters, boosting output to 273 horses and 270 pound-feet. The bump in power is manifested not only at the track-0 to 60 in 7.8 seconds and the quarter mile in 16.0 at 87.5 mph-but also in the real world, where three tenths are more than welcome on a twisty road or when carrying seven passengers. Further, while editors have been impressed with the CX-9's enhanced energy, they continue to be smitten with its six-speed automatic. A carryover from the 2007 model, the Aisin automatic is one of the most refined, intuitive automatics we've sampled. It remains to be seen, though, whether the CX-9, as a package, will prove as endearing over the long haul.   | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | | Base Price | $35,250 | | Price as Tested | $41,540 | | Vehicle Layout | Front engine, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door SUV | | Engine | 3.7L/273-hp/270-lb-ft DOHC 24-valve V-6 | | Transmission | 6-speed automatic | | Curb Weight | 4624 lb (55/45%) | | Wheelbase | 113.2 in | | Length x Width x Height | 199.8 x 76.2 x 68.0 in | | 0-60 mph | 7.8 sec | | Quarter Mile | 16.0 sec @ 87.5 mph | | Braking, 60-0 mph | 125 ft | | Lateral acceleration | 0.78 g (avg) | | MT Figure Eight | 28.0 sec @ 0.59 g (avg) | | EPA City/Hwy Econ | 15/21 mpg | | CO2 Emissions | 1.13 lb/mile | | Total Mileage | 5492 mi | | Average Test mpg | 16.2 mpg | | Unresolved Problem Areas | None |
|
|
|
| |