|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article From Motor Trend Magazine
Road Test: 2003 Ford SVT Focus ZX5, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart, 2004 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V, 2004 Subaru Impreza 2.5 RS
Article provided by: Motor Trend Magazine
 Ford SVT Focus ZX5 Ford's in-house go-fast/look-good group SVT (Special Vehicle Team) has a way of bringing out the best in any vehicle on which it lay its hands, and the Focus is no exception. It already has commendable manners, so SVT sharpens all of them for battle without making a mockery of the original.
The car's 2.0-liter Zetec engine is free-revving all the way up to its lofty 7200-rpm redline; drivers will find more throttle response--and driving pleasure--in those upper ranges. Once there, the slick-shifting twin-layshaft Getrag six-speed manual offers immediate and unambiguous gear selection. Spending more time in typical L.A. traffic, however, several editors noted an annoying electronic throttle overrun wherein the revs take an inordinate amount of time to fall between shifts. We couldn't rely on engine braking for the same reason. Otherwise, the large-diameter exhaust system bellows with authority and bravado, while perfect pedal placement and quick steering reward every request with the same polished, almost-European competence.  Suspension of the SVT Focus ZX5 is beefed up from SVT ZX3-based struts with slightly stiffer springs, retuned Tokico dampers, and the same serious 17-inch wheels and tires. Despite some body roll and front-tire sidewall scrubbing, the Focus remains balanced and predictable when pushed, yet smooth and sophisticated in the city. Compared with the others, it really does offer the best of both worlds, as our backsides and handling tests confirm: nearly 67 mph in the slalom and 0.86g on the skidpad. These are genuine sports-car numbers. In our new Figure-Eight all-performance test, (see our June 2003 issue for a detailed explanation), the SVT Focus remains in second gear throughout the run--over approximately a third of a mile. This means there's one fewer upshift/downshift than with the others in this comparison, allowing the driver to focus on driving deep into the skidpad while applying the brakes. The result is a second-place finish behind the Mitsubishi by the narrowest of margins. Where the Focus loses time is at the exit of the skidpad onto the straight portion, where the relatively high second gear and lack of low-rpm torque slows its acceleration. Topping off this performance trifecta are disc brakes and ABS that bring the world to a halt from 60 mph in just 119 feet--the best in the test by a significant 14 feet. ... >>next page
|
2009 Ford Focus RS to Debut at London Motor Show
BRENTWOOD, July 4, 2008 – The legendary Ford RS performance car brand is returning in the shape of the exciting new...
07/07/2008 | 20:07 PM
|
|
American Idol's Surprise Guest: 2009 Ford Focus
DEARBORN, Mich., May 13, 2008 – The hot-selling Ford Focus debuts anew coupe version for the 2009 model year...
06/04/2008 | 07:06 AM
|
|
2009 Ford Focus RS give High-Performance in Europe
Ford has confirmed it. 2009 will mark the return of the fast Ford compact to European lineup....
12/27/2007 | 16:12 PM
|
|
2008 Ford Focus expands in European Market
BRENTWOOD, Essex,11 September, 2007 - Winner of more than 80 awards and the only vehicle in the world to be named Car...
09/11/2007 | 17:09 PM
|
|
Ford shows Focus, Kuga, Verve concepts at Frankfurt Show
DEARBORN, Sept. 10, 2007 -- A concept, a crossover and a cool new Focus highlight Ford of Europe's presence at the 2007...
09/11/2007 | 15:09 PM
|
|
|
2003 Ford Focus Serpentine Belt
I have a 2003 Ford Focus 2.0 DOHC zetec. I am trying to replace the serpentine belt. According to my Haynes manual for...
05/18/2007 | 22:05 PM
|
|
|
Ford Focus with vapor lock?
it could possibly be a fuel pressure problem, possible bad fuel pump check valve, fuel pressure regulator etc......
07/26/2006 | 17:07 PM
|
|
|
2001 Ford Focus ZX3 With Low Miles For Sale
2001 Ford Focus ZX3-white, 37,500 miles, A/C, very good condition. $6,000 OBOcontact: 520.777.5795 Ext. 201"...
05/27/2006 | 10:05 AM
|
|
|
2006 Ford Focus
Has anyone bought a 2006 Ford focus? If so how much did they pay?...
04/17/2006 | 11:04 AM
|
|
|
2000 Ford Focus start-up sputtering
I have a 2000 Ford Focus Zetec DOHC. Upon some start-ups(not all the time) it sputters and jerks violently untils it...
12/05/2005 | 15:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Street - 2000 Ford Focus
This Month's WinnerIs Jarrod Barnett.For his troubles, he'll receive enough Mothers car cleaning goodies to satisfy the most ana
more
|
|
|
|
| |