|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
Road Test: 2003 Ford SVT Focus ZX5, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart, 2004 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V, 2004 Subaru Impreza 2.5 RS
Four affordable non-turbo sport-compact sedans take to the urban jungle
Photography by Chris Walton, Wesley Allison
| The Players | | Ford's 2003 SVT Focus ZX5 ($19,085) sets the naturally aspirated factory-performance standard with its value, quality, and dedicated hardware, but Nissan's refreshed 2004 Sentra SE-R Spec V ($17,300) undercuts and over-powers it. Meanwhile, Mitsubishi offers a new 2004 Ralliart-tuned Lancer variant ($17,999) packing several Evo cues, and Subaru updates its all-wheel-drive Impreza 2.5 RS ($19,395) for 2004. | | The Game | | A full step up from their sedate, commuter-sedan roots (and a half-step below some turbocharged brethren), these four factory street fighters offer the punch and agility of cars costing much more. Which one is legit enough to be the new sport-compact leader? | If it seems like we've run stories like this before, it's because we have, with several matchups and varying winners over the past couple years. The reason is that sport-compacts make affordable performance accessible to everyone, without giving up the convenience or (much) comfort of the cars on which they're based. Just like the musclecar trend in the mid-1960s and early-1970s, highly sought young buyers are influencing what auto manufacturers choose--or need--to develop and sell. Would this burgeoning market segment exist without lowered, bestickered, swarm-of-hornets-sounding imports with thumping stereos? Would anybody know or care what "2 Fast 2 Furious" means? Nope. Today's young enthusiasts are driving a trend in the industry to offer factory-made, fully warranted, killer-stereo-packing sport-compact sedans, and we're cool with that. Besides, they're a blast to drive. It all started with "Thrash Compactors" (April 2002), which led to "Band Wagons" (May 2002) and most recently "Street Toughs" (June 2003). The Ford SVT Focus has competed once as a two-door and twice as a four-door hatchback. Subaru's Impreza has been around this block twice with the turbocharged WRX wagon and now the face-lifted, non-turbo 2.5 RS. Finally, the SE-R Spec V from Nissan makes its second appearance with upgrades for the new year. The only true newcomer, as a model, is the Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart. Before you type a poorly proofread e-mail suggesting we forgot to include the Honda Civic Si, Mazda Protege, or Volkswagen Jetta, remember the Civic ran (and didn't win) in April 2002, the Protege has been replaced by the Mazda3 (which isn't here yet), and the Jetta's four-cylinder model has a 1.8 turbo engine. This roundup is for $20K-ish sporty four-doors with a minimum 160-non-turbo horsepower. Got a hatchback? Bonus. Or what about all-wheel drive? Ditto. Six-speed tranny or LSD (limited-slip differential)? Go to the head of the class. You get the idea. We realize there are three all-conquering turbocharged siblings: the not-available-here European-spec Ford Focus RS, Mitsu Evolution, and Subaru WRX and STi. The last three are in another league, we've tested them exhaustively, and we'll save them for another comfort- and money-be-damned comparo when the VW Golf R32 arrives later this year (see "Tuners" in this issue).
|
|
Economical Hatchbacks
I recently test drove several hatchbacks (Scion xA, Kia Spectra5, Hyundai Elantra 5 dr, Suzuki Aerio & Reno, Ford...
10/19/2005 | 13:10 PM | Doohickie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'02 Ford Windstar (Curious)
I'm very curious, My dad just brought a 2002 Ford Windstar and my grandmother brought a 2002 Ford Focus at the same...
08/16/2005 | 20:08 PM | hinkLey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 Ford Focus FCV
'I believe fuel cells could end the 100-year reign of the internal combustion engine,' says William Clay Ford Jr. The chairman o
more
|
|
2002 SVT Focus
All at once, manufacturers have answered our call for higher performance compact machines. The Subaru WRX, Nissan SE-R Spec V an
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |