|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
Road Test: 2003 Ford SVT Focus ZX5, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart, 2004 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V, 2004 Subaru Impreza 2.5 RS
Conclusion As much as we love Subaru for bringing the WRX to our shores, the Impreza 2.5 RS, which looks like its rally-bred brother, simply isn't in the same league. Yes, it's the only one here with all-wheel drive and also offers the most comfortable ride. But this particular version of the Impreza doesn't have the upper-cut necessary to go toe-to-toe with the others, much less knock them out. A humble fourth place.
Nissan has been face-lifting and upgrading the Sentra SE-R with regularity since it was introduced. With that much effort and time invested, perhaps there isn't much left to nip and tuck. It rates a third-place finish for giving us a fine collection of excellent parts in a tried-and-true wrapper. From our first drive of the Lancer, we felt Mitsubishi had a great platform in its hands. Problem was, it needed decent rolling stock and enough underhood motivation to make things interesting. Well, we're half way there now with the Ralliart. This car is more refined and solid than it needs to be, is a blast, and ranks a strong second here. Well done Mitsubishi; now about that performance-tire option... Among this affordable foursome, the SVT Focus is our choice as the best all-around "real" sport compact. It's the one we'd most like to drive on a racetrack, and the one we'd most like to live with on a daily basis. It offers the most flexible and generous interior accommodations as well as the most comprehensive list of standard and available equipment (minus a turbo or all-wheel drive, that is). You can also get the Focus in two-door-hatch form, a configuration not offered by the others. Yes, it's the priciest among these players, but look at the list of options on our tester, subtract what you don't need (e.g. heated seats, traction control, moonroof, and HID headlamps), and you'll end up with a legit $20,300 sport compact that'll keep you entertained for years to come. if you like what you see here, be sure to check out our Thrash Compactors Wallpaper gallery, with images of each car you can download and keep on your desktop.
|
Small Ford Focus Grows while Ford F-150 Production Gets Cut
DEARBORN, Mich., June 20, 2008 - Ford Motor Company today said it is making further reductions to its North American...
06/23/2008 | 23:06 PM
|
|
2008 Ford Focus popularity prompts Production Increase
WAYNE, Mich., April 15, 2008 – Ford Motor Company said today that North American production of the Ford Focus will...
04/17/2008 | 16:04 PM
|
|
2008 Ford Focus is "Cool" Fourth Year in a Row
DEARBORN, Mich., April 29, 2008 – Editors of Kelley Blue Book’s kbb.com today named the 2008 Ford Focus one of the...
06/04/2008 | 07:06 AM
|
|
Ford bucks downward sales trend with Edge, Focus
DEARBORN, Mich., April 1, 2008 – Sales for Ford’s redesigned small car and acclaimed crossover utility continued to...
04/08/2008 | 22:04 PM
|
|
Ford Verve Concept hints U.S. Ford Focus Successors
DETROIT, Jan. 13, 2008 – Ford Motor Company is revealing the Verve, a concept vehicle that makes clear the vision for...
01/17/2008 | 15:01 PM
|
|
|
2003 Ford Focus Serpentine Belt
I have a 2003 Ford Focus 2.0 DOHC zetec. I am trying to replace the serpentine belt. According to my Haynes manual for...
05/18/2007 | 22:05 PM
|
|
|
2006 Ford Focus
Has anyone bought a 2006 Ford focus? If so how much did they pay?...
04/17/2006 | 11:04 AM
|
|
|
2000 Ford Focus start-up sputtering
I have a 2000 Ford Focus Zetec DOHC. Upon some start-ups(not all the time) it sputters and jerks violently untils it...
12/05/2005 | 15:12 PM
|
|
|
changing EGR tube on 2003 Ford Focus
the part number is YS4Z9D477AJ. I just went to Midas yesterday and they said mine needs to be replaced on my 2003 ford...
02/26/2008 | 00:02 AM
|
|
|
Ford Focus with vapor lock?
it could possibly be a fuel pressure problem, possible bad fuel pump check valve, fuel pressure regulator etc......
07/26/2006 | 17:07 PM
|
|
2002 Ford Focus SVT - Serenity Now
There are some days when we sit in the office and think back about the good ol' days; back when cars were all about American muscle versus Japanese technology. Things like the enchanting gargle of a f...
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |