|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
Road Test: 2006 Ford Fusion SEL vs. 2005 Honda Accord EX vs. 2006 Hyundai Sonata GLS vs. 2005 Toyota Camry LE
Family Values: Aisle six, corn flakes, detergent, white bread, sensible family sedans
By Kim Reynolds
Photography by Brian Vance
One morning it happens. You glance in the mirror while stabbing at the wall outlet with the shaver plug to see a rumpled 47-year-old guy glancing back. A guy with a wife, a feisty five-year-old, a wailing newborn, Graco's finest booster and reverse-facing child seats, and strong opinions about the LATCH system. And then--blink--you're also a guy with a big, illuminated light bulb over his head. Realization: All those automaton-driven Wonder Bread sedans, such as this comparison's Honda Accord, Toyota Camry, and newcomers Hyundai Sonata and Ford Fusion are your friends now--they can store a pallet of 40-count packages of diapers in a locking trunk so your single pals can't see them, ride comfortably in consideration of a newborn's fragile neck, don't tumble laterally off a corner if you suddenly swerve, and they aren't finicky--and they aren't minivans. Most important, they represent a value-for-the-money quotient that would be the envy of a Chinese Dixie Cup factory. Could there actually be more to this car thing than quarter-mile slips and slalom times after all? Your reflection is sadly nodding yes. This edition of our popular family-sedan four-way represents an interesting encounter. Although they could pass for any quartet of cars in any Home Depot parking lot, there are seismic implications here: Two--Toyota's Camry and Honda's Accord--represent an almost untoppleable status quo. Another spearheads the furious advance of the Korean manufacturers trying to do to Japan Car Inc. what the Camry and Accord did to Detroit. Completing the circle is Dearborn's quixotic gambit to recapture its past sedan glories. Speaking of bets, want to wager on these four sedans' origins? It's odd enough that all are North Americans, but what does one make of the lone "Detroit" car being built in Hermosillo, Mexico, while our Honda's birth certificate says Marysville, Ohio; our Toyota's, Georgetown, Kentucky; and our Hyundai's, Montgomery, Alabama. Tell us again which is the American car? Our terms of battle were V-6 engines coupled to automatic transmissions in the most typical trim available. Following the tenet that race horses are compared around turf ovals and poodles at dog shows, we mapped a route that dropped our family fetchers directly into their natural habitat, a big fat node of Southern California mock Spanish suburbia.
|
|
|
|
|
Bye, bye, Insight
Looks like the car with the best fuel economy (and nothing else) is leaving us:...
05/18/2006 | 16:05 PM | joela
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |