|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article From Motor Trend Magazine
Road Test: 2006 Hyundai Azera Limited vs. 2006 Toyota Avalon Touring vs. 2006 Volkswagen Passat 3.6L
Article provided by: Motor Trend Magazine
Given the stick, the 3.5-liter V-6's 268 horses put on a good show, launching the Avalon to the 60 mark in a purposeful 6.2 seconds, punctuated by subtle hints of gearshifts. An esoteric detail (given the Avalon's typical clientele) is the engine's genuinely refined bark as it climbs past 6000 rpm. As with the other two cars, the shifter offers a manumatic slot, but, unlike theirs, it's handily offset near the driver--a quick grab, should the demons speak. And when they do, our Touring-edition (more firmly suspended) Avalon is a better sport(ish) sedan than you'd think, though our clocks report it to be a half step behind the Passat and Azera in absolute slalom and skidpad pace. Like the Azera, it's perilously nose-heavy with a 61/39 front/rear weight distribution, but Toyota's stability system turns out to be a particularly cushy catcher's mitt, grabbing wayward chassis gyrations without a stinging rebuke back to the driver.  2006 Volkswagen Passat Interior At the track, we paid extra-close attention to our trio's handling quality (what with this being the first thing that goes when ride comfort counts.) Specifically, we zeroed in on three issues: steering effort, steering reaction time, and steady-speed understeer/oversteer--all these appraised at a brisk (but not atypical) 0.5 lateral-g cornering rate.  2006 Volkswagen Passat 3.6L Engine Turns out the Avalon actually understeers the least (surprise), needing 1.4 degrees of additional front-wheel angle to produce our half-g cornering pace around the skidpad (the Passat registered next at 1.5 degrees, the Azera last at 1.6--that's 14-percent-more understeer than the Avalon). Further, the Toyota required the least effort (3.5 pounds) to maintain that cornering rate. That's lightish, but on the edge of plausibility for a serious driver's car. Our third query is called the "step-steer test," wherein, starting from a straight path, the steering is quickly flicked an amount that'll yield our target 0.5 g. Reaction time in the duration between flick and steady cornering is the focus here. The Avalon's fell midpack, more sluggish than the Passat's, but a tad livelier than the Azera's. ... >>next page
|
Toyota Avalon, Lexus SC, here to stay
As the American auto companies make decisions on what models to dropfrom their fleets, rumors persist that other...
07/18/2008 | 22:07 PM
|
|
Hyundai Beats Toyota In Intellichoice's Best Deals
CAMPBELL, CA (September 12, 2007) -- IntelliChoice.com (www.intellichoice.com), the leading source for automotive...
09/11/2007 | 16:09 PM
|
|
Toyota brings lasers for driving control, comfort.
September 19, 2006 – Torrance, CA - Dynamic Laser Cruise Control (DLCC) is offered in select Toyota and Lexus models,...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
Top 10 Picks for Best Family Car
Consumer Reports recently compiled its picks for the best vehicles for families as the holiday season reaches its peak....
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
New Cars cost over Fifty Cents per Mile to Own, Operate
AAA, the source for all things cars, has come out with its new 2008edition of “Your Driving Costs.†According to...
04/08/2008 | 05:04 AM
|
|
|
|
| |