|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
Head to Head: 2007 Honda Civic Si Sedan vs. 2007 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V
Battle of the esses:Toe to toe, blow to blow, wall to wall
By Edward Loh
Photography by Julia LaPalme
It's draft day and you're on the clock. On the board are highly prized recruits from two noted powerhouses. Though your lottery pick is way up there, your salary cap is restricted to roughly $23 grand. You can take only one, so choose wisely. Both prospects are front-engine, front-drive, four-door sport sedans from programs with storied traditions in this category. Though Honda has been building the Civic Si since 1986-five years before Nissan made its first SE-R-it's never done a sedan. Nissan has been making SE-R sedans since 2002, but the tale of the tape reveals no significant advantage for either rookie. In fact, from mundane to exotic, whatever parameter you measure, the cars are nearly identical. Each vehicle's wheelbase, width, and front and rear track are all within an inch of the other's. Both vehicles come equipped with six-speed manual gearboxes (standard) and helical-type limited-slip differentials (a $400 option on the SE-R Spec V). The largest physical disparity is under the hood, but even that's a bit of a wash (197 to 200 horses). Sure, the Si is down a half liter and 41 pound-feet to the 2.5-liter Spec V engine, but the Honda also weighs about 150 pounds less than the Nissan.  Our tarmac combine reveals similar performances as well. Toe to toe and blow for blow, both click the stopwatches within tenths of each other. The extra torque provided by the SE-R's displacement advantage means it sprints to 40 mph one tenth of a second quicker than the Si, but they're tied at 50 mph. By 60 mph, the Si has pulled ahead by a tenth and holds this lead through the quarter mile. And though the Civic manages to stop three feet shorter from 60 mph and pull 0.01 g higher on the skidpad, it's still too close to call. How is it then, that when the selection clock runs down, one of these bluechippers will distinguish itself as a future Hall-of-Famer, while the other will seem destined to ride the pine? Well, some of it has to do with what coaches and draft pundits call "intangibles," but the key differences are apparent from the very first throttle blip. Southern California's Montezuma Valley Road is the perfect place for a private workout session for these twins. Bombing up and down this 12-mile, 40-plus-turn, desert highway is an exercise fraught with anxiety, especially when your rearview mirrors are filled with the Si's sloping snout. Though only 2.6 inches taller than the Si, the way the Spec V leans over in corners makes it feel much larger in the tight canyon confines. But it's not slow; switch places and the Spec V can hang with the Si-if only just. The problem is, doing so generates a whiter-knuckle grip on the steering wheel and beads of sweat in the corners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Honda Civic Goes All Natural
Natural gas that is. Buyers who have been waiting for such a vehicle for purchase now have that opportunity. Last week,...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM | jarellano
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Honda Civic
THE TRAGIC EXPERIENCE IN HAPPY HONDAYesterday (July, 24th),at 6 pm, my wife, my son and I went to HAPPY HONDA at...
07/28/2007 | 02:07 AM | happy_honda
|
|
|
Bye, bye, Insight
Looks like the car with the best fuel economy (and nothing else) is leaving us:...
05/18/2006 | 16:05 PM | joela
|
|
|
Buying a Honda Civic??
import-luver3Hey everybody, just been looking for a new car now, with these sky-rocketing gas prices, and have seen...
08/11/2006 | 21:08 PM | import-luver3
|
|
|
|
|
2001 IASCA World Finals
Pictures explain only a part of such an incredible event. Yes, we can show cars, the systems, the people... but the images leave
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |