|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
Head to Head: 2007 Honda Civic Si Sedan vs. 2007 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V
|   | 2007 Honda Civic Si | 2007 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V | | POWERTRAIN/CHASSIS | | DRIVETRAIN LAYOUT | Front engine, FWD | Front engine, FWD | | ENGINE TYPE | I-4, alum block/head | I-4, alum block/head | | VALVETRAIN | DOHC, 4 valves/cyl | DOHC, 4 valves/cyl | | DISPLACEMENT | 121.9 cu in/1998cc | 151.9 cu in/2488cc | | COMPRESSION RATIO | 11.0:1 | 10.5:1 | | POWER (SAE NET) | 197 hp @ 7800 rpm | 200 hp @ 6600 rpm | | TORQUE (SAE NET) | 139 lb-ft @ 6100 rpm | 180 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm | | REDLINE | 8000 rpm | 7000 rpm | | WEIGHT TO POWER | 14.9 lb/hp | 15.4 lb/hp | | TRANSMISSION | 6-speed manual | 6-speed manual | | AXLE/FINAL-DRIVE RATIOS | 4.77:1/3.14:1 | 4.43:1/2.79:1 | | SUSPENSION, FRONT; REAR | Struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar | Struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar; torsion beam, coil springs anti-roll bar | | STEERING RATIO | 13.6:1 | 16.4:1 | | TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK | 2.7 | 2.9 | | BRAKES, F;R | 11.8-in vented disc; 10.2-in disc; ABS | 12.6-in vented disc; 11.5-in disc; ABS | | WHEELS, F;R | 17.0 x 7.0 in, cast aluminum | 17.0 x 7.0 in, cast aluminum | | TIRES, F;R | 215/45R17 91W, Michelin Pilot Exalto PE2 | 225/45R17 91W, Continental Conti SportContact2 | | DIMENSIONS | | WHEELBASE | 106.3 in | 105.7 in | | TRACK, F/R | 59.0/60.2 in | 59.5/60.4 in | | LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT | 176.7 x 69.0 x 56.5 in | 180.1 x 70.5 x 59.1 in | | TURNING CIRCLE | 35.4 ft | 35.4 ft | | CURB WEIGHT | 2938 lb | 3081 lb | | WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION, F/R | 60/40% | 64/37% | | SEATING CAPACITY | 5 | 5 | | HEADROOM | 38.1/36.7 in | 40.6/37.3 in | | LEGROOM | 42.2/34.6 in | 42.4/34.5 in | | SHOULDER | 53.6/52.3 in | 54.1/53.0 in | | CARGO VOLUME | 12.0 cu ft | 12.0 cu ft | | TEST DATA | | ACCELERATION TO MPH | | 0-30 | 2.4 sec | 2.2 sec | | 0-40 | 3.5 | 3.4 | | 0-50 | 4.7 | 4.7 | | 0-60 | 6.3 | 6.4 | | 0-70 | 8.2 | 8.3 | | 0-80 | 10.5 | 10.8 | | 0-90 | 13.3 | 13.7 | | 0-100 | 16.7 | 17.1 | | PASSING, 45-65 MPH | 3.2 | 3.3 | | QUARTER MILE | 14.8 sec @ 94.8 mph | 14.9 sec @ 93.6 mph | | BRAKING, 60-0 MPH | 123 ft | 126 ft | | LATERAL ACCELERATION | 0.89 g (avg) | 0.88 g (avg) | | MT FIGURE EIGHT | 27.0 sec @ 0.64 g (avg) | 27.4 sec @ 0.64 g (avg) | | TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH | 2700 rpm | 2400 rpm | | CONSUMER INFO | | BASE PRICE | $21,885 | $20,525 | | PRICE AS TESTED | $23,835 | $22,725 | | STABILITY/TRACTION CONTROL | Yes/yes | No/no | | AIRBAGS | Dual front, front side, f/r curtain | Dual front, front side, f/r curtain | | BASIC WARRANTY | 3 yrs/36,000 miles | 3 yrs/36,000 miles | | POWERTRAIN WARRANTY | 5 yrs/36,000 miles | 5 yrs/36,000 miles | | ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE | N/A | N/A | | FUEL CAPACITY | 13.2 gal | 14.5 gal | | EPA CITY/HWY ECON | 23/32 mpg | 24/31 mpg | | CO2 EMISSIONS | 0.74 lb/mile | 0.73 lb/mile | | RECOMMENDED FUEL | Unleaded premium | Unleaded premium |
|
2008 Hyundai Elantra passes Honda Civic by a Point
Well it seems that both the Japanese and American auto makers have been eclipsed by a South Korean manufacturer for the...
06/17/2008 | 00:06 AM
|
|
Honda Civic Sales Show Shift In Consumer Buying Habits
06/03/2008 -TORRANCE, Calif. - American Honda Motor *** Inc., May sales of 167,997, up 11.3 percent on a...
06/05/2008 | 00:06 AM
|
|
1987 Honda Civic CRX HF and 57 MPG. Why Not Today?
20 years ago, Honda sold a Civic that got better fuel economy than any car today, even hybrids. This may come as a...
01/07/2008 | 14:01 PM
|
|
2008 Honda Civic MUGEN Si High Speed at $29,500
10/23/2007 - TORRANCE, Calif. - The 2008 Honda Civic MUGEN Si Sedan is arriving at dealerships nationwide with a...
11/29/2007 | 22:11 PM
|
|
2008 Honda Civic MUGEN Si to Arrive as Halloween Treat
07/23/2007 - LEXINGTON, Ohio - A factory-prepared 2008 Honda Civic MUGEN Si Sedan will debut in mid-October, American...
07/29/2007 | 21:07 PM
|
|
1992 Honda Civic Hatchback
Getting a car featured in the pages of Super Street magazine is not as easy as it may seem. Many times it takes months, sometimes years (and sometimes never) to get in the book. Sometimes it just take...
more
|
|
|
|
1998 Honda Civic Coupe - Red Said Fred
It was a late Saturday night, and we had just returned from a party, when my friend Steve went on a tangent. He claimed that our lives and actions can be explained by the episodes and evolution of Bay...
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |