|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
First Test: 2008 Ford Focus
Safe at first: The Blue Oval team doesn't swing for the fence, but puts a runner on base
By Matt Stone
The enthusiast media has posed the question: "Why doesn't Ford give us the smash-hit, European-spec Focus?" That car is based on the company's C1 chassis architecture, which also underpins the excellent Mazda3. Ford asked itself the same thing about two years ago and made the business decision to go with a less-costly, potentially more profitable Focus for North America by giving the current car a substantial redo instead.  Just about everything you can see or touch is new. Ford has pared the lineup to two body styles: a four-door and a two-door with a trunk, the latter replacing the previous three-door hatchback. The wagon and five-door hatch are gone. All sheetmetal is new, save for the four-door's roof panel. The new styling is different from the old: clean in profile, if a bit gimmicky in a few places. Powertrains carry over in the form of the 2.0-liter, 140-horsepower four and a P-ZEV version that cranks out 132. The safety quotient is up-with no price increase-including standard front, side, and side-curtain airbags plus a tire-pressure-monitoring system.  Ford put a lot of effort into reducing NVH, and this shows. Road rumble is down considerably, and the car rides with suppleness it lacked before. Steering feel and response have improved too. A new acoustic glass windshield reduces engine and wind noise. The trunk is larger than a Civic's or Corolla's. The Focus has given up its enthusiast notions, but is fun to drive for a price-point machine. Its biggest news is Sync, a connectivity system developed in concert with Microsoft. You can connect nearly any phone, iPod, MP3 player, or other device via Sync's MP3 jack, USB port, or BlueTooth and operate it hands-free. It takes a few minutes to learn the system's commands, but once you've got it down, Sync makes using your electronic toys easy and safe. It'll appear on 12 Ford, Mercury, and Lincoln products this year (standard on some, and a just-$395 option on the rest). And that's the biggest news in the new Focus. The reconstituted Focus forges no new ground and isn't the match of the class-leading Civic in any way. | 2008 Ford Focus SES | | Base price | $14,695 | | Price as tested | $19,175.00 | | Vehicle layout | Front-engine, FWD, 5-pass, 2/4-door | | Engine | 2.0L/140-hp/136-lb-ft DOHC 16-valve I-4 | | Transmissions | 5-speed manual, 4-speed automatic | | Curb weight (f/r dist) | 2755 (59/41%) | | Wheelbase | 102.9 in | | Length x width x height | 175.0 x 67.8 x 58.6 in | | 0-60 mph | 8.3 sec | | Quarter mile | 16.3 sec @ 83.5 mph | | Braking, 60-0 mph | 136 ft | | Lateral acceleration | 0.78 g (avg) | | MT Figure Eight | 28.8 sec @ 0.58 g (avg) | | EPA city/hwy fuel econ | 24/35 mpg | | CO2 emissions | 0.69 lb/mile | | On sale in U.S. | Currently |
|
|
|
|
|
Project Focus ZX3: Part 1
It's about time! We've been promising a Focus project car since our first driving impression more than 17 months ago, but we have, to say the least, been a little behind schedule. As much as we enjoy ...
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |