|
Head to Head: 2006 BMW Z4 M Coupe vs 2006 Porsche Cayman S
Head to Head: 2006 Porsche Cayman S vs BMW Z4 M Coupe
Article provided by: Motor Trend Magazine
1ST PLACEPorsche Cayman SStill the heir-apparent,lord-in-waiting to the porsche 911 sports-car-icon throne. 2ND PLACEBMW Z4 M CoupeNear-perfect weight balance, remarkable grip, formidable power - just not as much fun as the Porsche. | | BMW Z4 M Coupe | Porsche Cayman S | | POWERTRAIN/CHASSIS | | DRIVETRAIN LAYOUT | Front engine, RWD | Mid-engine, RWD | | ENGINE TYPE | I-6, alum block/head | Flat-6, alum block/heads | | VALVETRAIN | DOHC, 4 valves/cyl | DOHC, 4 valves/cyl | | DISPLACEMENT | 198.1 cu in/3246cc | 206.7 cu in/3387cc | | COMPRESSION RATIO | 11.5:1 | 11.1:1 | | POWER (SAE NET) | 330 hp @ 7900 rpm | 295 hp @ 6250 rpm | | TORQUE (SAE NET) | 262 lb-ft @ 4900 rpm | 251 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm | | REDLINE | 8000 rpm | 7200 rpm | | WEIGHT TOPOWER | 10.0 lb/hp | 10.5 lb/hp | | TRANSMISSION | 6-speed manual | 6-speed manual | | AXLE/FINAL-DRIVE RATIOS | 3.62:1/3.08:1 | 3.88:1/3.18:1 | | SUSPENSION, FRONT; REAR | Struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar | Struts, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; struts, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar | | STEERING RATIO | 15.4:1 | 13.8-17.1:1 | | TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK | 3.0 | 2.6 | | BRAKES, F;R | 13.7-in vented, drilled disc; 12.9-in vented, drilled disc, ABS | 12.5-in vented, drilled disc; 11.8-in vented, drilled disc, ABS | | WHEELS, F;R | 18 x 8.0 in; 18 x 9.0 in, cast aluminum | 19 x 8.0 in; 19 x 9.0 in, cast aluminum | | TIRES, F;R | 225/45ZR18; 255/40ZR18, Continental ContiSport Contact | 235/35ZR19 87Y; 265/35ZR19 94Y, Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 | DIMENSIONS | | WHEELBASE | 98.3 in | 95.1 in | | TRACK, F/R | 58.5/59.7 in | 58.5/60.2 in | | LENGTH X WIDTH X HEIGHT | 161.9 x 70.1 x 50.7 in | 172.1 x 70.9 x 51.4 in | | TURNING CIRCLE | 34.3 ft | 36.4 ft | | CURB WEIGHT | 3303 lb | 3109 lb | | WEIGHT DIST., F/R | 50/50% | 46/54% | | SEATING CAPACITY | 2 | 2 | | HEADROOM | 37.3 in | 37.8 in | | LEGROOM | 42.0 in | 44.0 in (est) | | SHOULDER ROOM | 52.5 in | 51.5 in | | CARGO VOLUME | 00.0 cu ft | 14.1 cu ft | | TEST DATA | | ACCELERATION TO MPH | | | | 0-30 | 1.7 sec | 1.7 sec | | 0-40 | 2.8 | 2.5 | | 0-50 | 3.8 | 3.7 | | 0-60 | 4.9 | 4.8 | | 0-70 | 6.4 | 6.1 | | 0-80 | 8.0 | 8.0 | | 0-90 | 9.8 | 9.7 | | 0-100 | 12.2 | 11.8 | | PASSING, 45-65 MPH | 2.3 | 2.3 | | QUARTER MILE | 13.4 sec @ 104.2 mph | 13.3 sec @ 105.0 mph | | BRAKING, 60-0 MPH | 122 ft | 116 ft | | 600-FT SLALOM | 64.5 mph avg | 69.1 mph avg | | LATERAL ACCELERATION | 0.90 g avg | 1.01 g avg | | MT FIGURE EIGHT | 25.8 sec @ 0.71 g avg | 24.7 sec @ 0.79 g avg | | 1.9-MI ROAD COURSE LAP | 102.7 sec | 101.6 sec | | TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH | 2450 rpm | 2500 rpm | | CONSUMER INFO | | BASE PRICE | $49,995 | $59,695 | | PRICE AS TESTED | $56,270 | $67,435 | | STABILITY/TRACTION CONTROL | Yes/yes | Yes/yes | | AIRBAGS | Dual front, fr side, fr knee | Dual front, front side | | BASIC WARRANTY | 4 yrs/50,000 miles | 4 yrs/50,000 miles | | POWERTRAIN WARRANTY | 4 yrs/50,000 miles | 4 yrs/50,000 miles | | ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE | 4 yrs/50,000 miles | 4 yrs/50,000 miles | | FUEL CAPACITY | 14.5 gal | 19.6 gal | | EPA CITY/HWY ECON | 16/24 mpg | 20/28 mpg | | MT FUEL ECONOMY | 18.4 mpg | 19.7 mpg | | RECOMMENDED FUEL | Premium unleaded | Premium unleaded |
|
|
TechArt GTSport Porsche Cayman S
It seriously looks like a 911 from the front. I love techart....
07/06/2006 | 12:07 PM
|
|
|
"Inexpensive" Porsche Cayman coming to US in July
For those who are interested:...
06/09/2006 | 09:06 AM
|
|
|
Porsche Cayman S CR-42
What amazes me most about this car is the perofrmance they are getting from a normaly aspirated engine. I mean 420hp...
06/08/2006 | 17:06 PM
|
|
|
Porsche... Cayman?
Hmm, there's gonna be four Porsches (the Cayenne doesn't count)? Not bad at all. But why not some variety: bring back...
02/24/2005 | 18:02 PM
|
|
|
E92 M3 specs
Honestly, $54k for that level of performance isn't that outrageous. Granted, it's WAY out of my budget, but that's...
10/17/2006 | 09:10 AM
|
|