|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
Mid-Lux Sport with Utility
Three countries of origin. Three distinct personalities
Photography by Chris Walton, David Newhardt
In a strange-but-appropriate way, each of these luxury-brand sport/utilities owes much of its personality to the people who produce it.
The English are world renowned for a steadfast grip on tradition and style, with a loose grasp on the culinary arts (the exception being their malt beverages, which are among the best in the civilized world). The Japanese are generally well mannered, aggressive in their use of technology, and fond of curious design and foods. Here, in the U.S. of A, we're exceedingly diverse and, as a result, often at odds with one another. Proud at best and boisterous at worst, we have a penchant for power, trendiness, and conspicuous consumption.
What does any of this have to do with SUVs?  2003 Land Rover Discovery HSE Like the British who build it, the Land Rover adheres to tradition. Featuring solid axles front and rear, permanent all-wheel drive with a lever-action two-speed transfer case and lock-up center differential and engine architecture dating back to the Cold War, the Discovery is the primordial SUV. We can picture Marlin Perkins using one to chase water buffalo on "Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom." That's not to say there haven't been updates and improvements to the hardware, however. By Land Rover's count, there have been 368 engineering changes and extensive quality-control and manufacturing-process improvements since last year's Series II model. From door seals to a wheel-balancing technique, the '03 Discovery is as new as it can be without starting from scratch (an all-new Discovery is scheduled for 2005 at the earliest). 2003 Land Rover Discovery HSE WHAT'S HOT · Off-road capable · Qualifies for Ultra-Low Emissions status · No running boards WHAT'S NOT · Poor on-road manners · Below-average fuel consumption · No side airbags or head curtains | Foremost on the update list is a stroked 4.6-liter OHV V-8 (borrowed from last year's Range Rover) that ups the Discovery's horsepower by 29 to a more competitive but still meager (by American standards) 217, and its modern emissions controls allow it to qualify for super-clean ULEV status. The electronically controlled four-speed ZF transmission offers Normal, Sport, and Manual modes, and it shifts smartly and intelligently in most situations. New-compound brake pads and revised front calipers unite to improve brake feel and performance. Revised frame-to-body mounts combine with redrafted suspension geometry and self-leveling air-springs (in HSE trim) to better ride quality and reduce noise, vibration, and harshness levels. These enhancements are successful, but considering what Land Rover has to work with, there's still room for more refinement. And while the Discovery's base price has increased by more than $3000, it's the least-expensive tester this time around.
|
Mid-Lux Sport with Utility
2003 Land Rover Discovery HSE, Lexus GX 470, Lincoln Aviator: Three countries of origin. Three distinct personalities.
more
|
|
2007 Lincoln Aviator
After the Explorer-based Aviator failed to take flight, Lincoln is introducing a crossover vehicle of the same name at the 2006
more
|
|
Mid-Lux Sport with Utility
2003 Land Rover Discovery HSE, Lexus GX 470, Lincoln Aviator: Three countries of origin. Three distinct personalities.
more
|
|
Spied: 2007 Lincoln Aviator
Looking quite a bit like the concept we first saw at the 2004 Detroit Auto Show, the newer, smaller Aviator boasts a smaller, sl
more
|
|
2003 Lincoln Aviator
That toothy chrome grille looks good on Lincoln's new midsize Aviator SUV. Large, square taillamp...
more
|
|
|
|
|
|