|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
Snow Blind: 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2003 Subaru Forester
When water turns to ice and snow, what does all-wheel drive really get you?
Photography by John Kiewicz
Snow. It's an atmospheric anomaly in Los Angeles and something our So Cal-based editors see little of. Yet, for every reader who actually takes his sport/utility to the desert for some heavy-duty rock crawling, there are dozens who routinely drive on snow, slush, mud, or wet roads.
That's why manufacturers are placing more emphasis on offering full-time all-wheel-drive systems. While some SUVs may not have the low-range transfer case required for heavy trailwork, AWD adds traction that helps them go a few more places, potentially increasing the safety margin of doing so, whatever the weather. With apologies to Audi, an ever-growing number of today's newest sport/utilities and crossovers are about all-roading, as opposed to off-roading. Two new, affordable players in this growing subset of the SUV universe are Subaru's updated Forester and Mitsubishi's new-for-'03 Outlander. We chose one of each and went in search of tractional challenges--and got more than we bargained for. SNAPSHOT The Players Subaru's Forester ($24,220), one of the best AWD wagons around, finds competition from Mitsubishi in the form of the new Outlander ($20,877). Is the Subie worth the extra $3.5 grand?
The Game Chasing a serious storm in order to test AWD in the snow, the storm ends up chasing us. | At 9000-feet elevation, Mammoth Mountain--in the heart of the Sierra Nevada range--is a Mecca for skiers, with an average of 385 inches of snow each year. As luck would have it, meteorologists predicted arctic air from Alaska would collide with a Pacific warm front, bringing the snow level down to 4500 feet just as we prepared to hit the road. But we were well armed. The new kid on the AWD crossover block, Mitsubishi's Outlander delivers a solid value hit to the segment. Our LS tester came with all the essentials, but without many frills. Basing at $19,297, it carried a grand's worth of options: the convenience package (including cargo cover, keyless entry, roof rails, and floormats) and appearance group (16-inch alloy wheels and rear privacy glass). With destination fees, the tab came to an easy-to-take $20,877.  After over 25 years of producing four-wheel-drive vehicles, Subaru knows a thing or two about getting its customers to the grocery store and back when there's a foot of snow on the ground. Our Forester 2.5 XS came loaded with cold-weather goodies that aren't even options on the Outlander: AM/FM/weatherband/cassette/six-disc CD in-dash changer, outside- temperature gauge, dual-mode heated front seats, front/rear-window wiper/de-icer, and dual power heated exterior mirrors. With a base price of $22,895 and an extra $1300 for the automatic transmission, plus destination charges, the Subaru costs nearly $3500 more than the Mitsu.
|
2009 Subaru Forester tested Safe from All Crashes
CHERRY HILL, N.J., May 21, 2008 — Subaru of America, Inc. today announced that the 2009 Subaru Forester earned the...
06/03/2008 | 22:06 PM
|
|
2009 Subaru Forester is, again, Top Safety Pick
Cherry Hill, N.J., April 17, 2008 — The all-new 2009 Subaru Forester has earned the Insurance Institute for Highway...
04/23/2008 | 05:04 AM
|
|
2009 Subaru Forester All-Mature at Detroit Auto Show
DETROIT -- Subaru of America, Inc. today introduced the all-new, third-generation 2009 Forester. A total re-design of...
01/16/2008 | 15:01 PM
|
|
Redesigned 2009 Subaru Forester priced lower than 2008 model
Want something sporty but functional? Oh, and less expensive than its last year model (but packed with even more...
03/02/2008 | 18:03 PM
|
|
2009 Subaru Forester is All-Bold for Detroit Auto Show
CHERRY HILL, N.J -- Subaru of America, Inc. today released the first official photos of the all-new, third-generation...
01/04/2008 | 13:01 PM
|
|
2008 Subaru Forester Photo Gallery
Subaru Forester's Sport Utility Tough, Car Easy crossover design blends positive SUV attributes such as a high seating point and interior versatility with passenger car comfort, handling and fuel effi...
more
|
|
|
|
2003 Subaru Forester
The Forester line was introduced in model-year '98 as a tallish, soft-road- able wagon. For '03, ...
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|