|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article From Motor Trend Magazine
Road Test: 2005 Ford Freestyle vs 2004 Chrysler PacificaSome would say there's nothing more uncool than driving your mom's car...Pacifica and Freestyle suggest Chrysler and Ford are starting to get the message. / By Matt Stone / Photography by Brian Vance /
Article provided by: Motor Trend Magazine
If you were a child of the 1960s, you'd sooner beg your dentist for a root canal than drive the old Country Squire. Anyone a half-step younger would avoid the family Reliant or Aries wagon like an airport strip search. But love 'em or hate 'em, station wagons are an efficient way to move people and stuff. So the challenge for carmakers looking to reinvent the station wagon for the 21st century is not to create yet another new segment, but to banish an old stigma. Enter the Chrysler Pacifica and Ford Freestyle. New this year, the Pacifica shares powertrains and other components with the Town & Country and Caravan minivans. The Freestyle bows as a 2005 model; its architecture stems from that of the Volvo XC90, not a bad place to start. Similarities: a unibody (non-truck-based) chassis design, regular front-hinged doors, a wide-opening rear hatch, three rows of seats, a V-6 engine, an automatic transmission, standard front drive, and optional all-wheel drive. Neither offers fake-wood appliques on the side body panels.  In terms of style, the Freestyle is generic Ford SUV-lite, a deliberate move designed to banish those old Country Squire ghosts. As you'd expect from Chrysler, the Pacifica is more dramatic: wider, lower, more glittery. Against the tape, the Freestyle is an inch longer overall, but rides on a 3.4-inch-shorter wheelbase. The Chrysler is 4.9 inches wider than the Ford, although their tracks are all within an inch of each other. The Ford has 5.7 cubic feet more maximum cargo volume. (See the sidebar for more interior space discussion.)  Despite their load-lugging pretensions, neither seems equipped to haul six people and their cargo up a long grade without raising a sweat, much less set your pulse racing at the traffic lights. The Pacifica's base engine is Chrysler's 3.5-liter SOHC V-6 rated at 250 horsepower, while the Freestyle makes do with a 203-horsepower, 3.0-liter DOHC V-6. You'd expect the Ford to be left standing, but you'd be wrong: Despite 47 fewer ponies, the Freestyle outruns the Pacifica to 60 by 4/10ths of a second (both our testers were all-wheel-drive versions), although at 9.2 seconds it's still a full second slower than a Honda Pilot. The Freestyle's continuously variable transmission helps make the most of the engine's modest output, adjusting to load conditions and the demands of the driver's right foot to keep the engine in its sweet spot. The Chrysler's maximum power comes at a high 6400 rpm, but its engine is coarse and grainy at anything past midrange and entirely unenthusiastic about hustling the Pacifica along. The only transmission choice is Chrysler's four-speed AutoStick automatic. While the manual control is handy for selecting lower gears when descending hills and such, this tranny sends shudders and shocks through the chassis, even on moderate shifts. ... >>next page
|
2008 Ford Taurus X Debuts At Chicago Auto Show
CHICAGO, Feb. 7, 2007 - Ford Motor Company today announced it is bringing back the well-known Ford Taurus name,...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
Ford Vehicle Quality Still Consistently High
DEARBORN, Mich., July 19 -- Ford Motor Company vehicles continue making dramatic strides in quality, outstripping the...
07/19/2007 | 13:07 PM
|
|
Ford, GM, Chrysler Don't Make 2006 Safest Vehicles Listing
Not one U.S. manufactured vehicle made the U.S. Insurance Industry's list of safest vehicles this year. The snub was...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
Ford provides more safety equipment as standard
DEARBORN, Mich., - Responding to the changing demographics of today’s driving population, Ford Motor Company is...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
Head Restraints May Be More Loose Than You Think
"Don't get your head tied up in a knot if you get into an accident."...
07/11/2007 | 16:07 PM
|
|
Review: 2006 Ford Freestyle
The well-composed Freestyle is the crossover vehicle that most Explorer intenders should consider, with better road manners, int
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|