|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article From Motor Trend Magazine
First Drive: 2006 Range Rover SuperchargedDriving Range: Now with a dollop of wallop / By Matt Stone / Photography by John Kiewicz /
Article provided by: Motor Trend Magazine
Wolfgang Reitzle was a senior exec at BMW when that company owned Land Rover, and he personally spearheaded the development of a new Range Rover planned for a 2002 introduction. He left to join Ford before the job was done--only to reinherit the project when the Blue Oval acquired Land Rover. When the flagship Rangie came to market, it did so carrying a BMW powerplant. Ford, for obvious reasons, wanted to segue to homegrown engines, taking the opportunity to do that, and much more, with a substantial midlife update for 2006. The previous BMW V-8 cranked out 282 horsepower and was backed by a five-speed automatic transmission. That combo has been replaced by two new powertrains: a 4.4-liter naturally aspirated aluminium V-8 good for 305 horses and an Eaton-supercharged 4.2-liter unit packing an impressive 400 ponies. Both are mated to an outstanding ZF six-speed automatic, offering a Sport mode and manual control. New grille and headlight treatments, plus redesigned A-pillar finishers, reduce wind noise. Chassis and subframe revisions make for more quiet as well. Audio/ nav/communications systems have been upgraded, and a rear-seat DVD audio/video system is available, too. The Supercharged model is visually distinguished via a mesh grille and side-gill treatment, badging, and dual exhaust pipes. As you'd expect, it also has sportier damping, stiffer anti-roll bars, larger and more aggressive rolling stock, and Brembo front brake calipers.  The current Range Rover didn't offer much to complain about, but the new one is sharper, more up-to-date, and more refined in every way. Only the fuzzy mouse-fur headliner, similar to that on many $20,000 cars, looks out of character. The blown model offers more performance than one needs in a luxury sport/utility, and the firmer handling is welcome at high speeds and in mountain passes. Land Rover should consider making its underpinnings optional on the base model as a Sport package. The ride remains supple, although with much enhanced road feel. The sales types guess that just 15 to 20 percent of next year's estimated 15,000 Range Rover sales will be of the Supercharged model. So, it'll enjoy the cachet of rarity (and a big sticker price) as well as its premium performance. Herr Reitzle would be proud. ... >>next page
|
2008 Land Rover Sport LE Brings Difference At $81,450
Irvine, Calif, August 10, 2007 -- Following the huge success of the Range Rover Sport in the U.S. market, Land Rover...
08/17/2007 | 17:08 PM
|
|
Land Rover LRX concept to debut at 2008 Detroit Auto Show
Set to make its debut at the upcoming 2008 North American International Auto Show in Detroit, Michigan, the Land Rover...
12/18/2007 | 17:12 PM
|
|
Electric Rovers strive to Beat Land Rover
If you're living in the UK, want an electric Land Rover but don't want to wait for Tata to build one, well, you're in...
06/03/2008 | 18:06 PM
|
|
Tata Motors may only have eyes on Land Rover
Tata's upcoming purchase of both Jaguar and Land Rover from the ailing Ford never really seemed to sit well. There was...
02/24/2008 | 20:02 PM
|
|
Land Rover LRX Hybrid's Striking New York Attire
NEW YORK, March 19, 2008 – A striking black and silver version of Land Rover's acclaimed LRX cross-coupe concept...
03/25/2008 | 19:03 PM
|
|
|
Escalade , Tahoe or Expedition??
Would you believe it? The Range Rover shares many major chassis bones and the V8 engine with the BMW X5. Rover was...
09/08/2007 | 05:09 AM
|
|
|
Foreign CAR!!!
Sounds like a scam to me. Check it out here -...
08/16/2005 | 20:08 PM
|
|
|
Top 10 Cars
cmr/BMWDude wrote: Land Rover Range Rover Expensive to run though. Only does about 9 MPG!...
05/28/2005 | 01:05 AM
|
|
|
2006 Jeep Commander
Ok...ok...just bare with me. I'm not sure who would actually buy a vehicle like this. It's, for lack of a better word,...
10/10/2006 | 10:10 AM
|
|
|
Land Rover, rated least reliable auto manufacturer.
As the owner of a 2002 Freelander which I traded in for a 2003 Discovery I can tell everyone to take seriously the...
07/10/2008 | 22:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|