|
|
|
|
Value Rating
Below Average
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
First Drive: 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara
Grand Illusion: Suzuki still makes pretty cool motorcycles, though
By Todd Lassa
Photography by the Manufacturer
Expanding from motorcycles to automobiles worked for Honda, so why not Suzuki? The maker of the magnificent Hayabusa bike only sells 80,000 cars and trucks a year, mostly on the strength of its Hyundai/Kia-matching 10-year/100,000-mile warranty. The Grand Vitara remains its icon four-wheeler. And, for 2006, it's much better than the one it replaces. But Suzuki has a long way to go to catch Honda, or Hyundai and Kia, for that matter--at least in terms of sales. The Grand Vitara has new, nicely creased sheetmetal on an integrated unibody frame chassis, and it wears the most handsome styling in its class. It has a wide track and a long wheelbase with short overhangs for stability and a 3000-pound towing capacity. Suspension is independent all around, MacPherson struts in front and multilink in back. But its engine is an anemic carryover 2.7-liter version of the old Grand Vitara's 2.5-liter V-6 making 185 horsepower at 6000 rpm and 184 pound-feet at 4500 rpm, up 20 horsepower and 22 pound-feet. It powers the rear wheels or all four through a new five-speed automatic. Suzuki offers two all-wheel-drive systems. All models get electronic stability control, and base and Premium-package Grand Vitaras offer full-time four-wheel drive for $1200. Serious off-roaders will want full-time four-mode four-wheel drive with a limited-slip differential, locking center diff, and low-range, available for $1400 on XSport and Luxury versions. You can go far off-road with it, well beyond the small-SUV competition. A five-speed manual is available only with rear drive or the base full-time 4WD system in the two lower trim levels.  Despite excellent off-roadability, the changes with the new model give it much more show than go. A handsome interior complements exterior styling, but suffers from hard plastics and unconvincing woodgrains. The slalom-style shiftgate discourages manual rowing of gears. And while wind noise is low, the SUV lets in noise from the road and its loud, thrashy, slow engine. On-road handling is fair, the steering somewhat vague. The automatic sometimes chooses unusual places to upshift or downshift on steep hills. The Grand Vitara would place high in the poorly represented compact sport/utility segment, which is full of aging Escapes and CR-Vs, if not for competition like the new Hyundai Tucson and Kia Sportage, and the upcoming V-6 Toyota RAV4. The Grand Vitara enters the market short of what it needs to be a contender.
|
Suzuki Flix, BaseCamp Are Versatile at Detroit Auto Show
In 2006, Suzuki Motor Corp. started what it calls its “Suzuki LIVE Series†which showcase lifestyle-themed concepts...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
Suzuki pulls out all-Stops with Cars, Bikes at SEMA
LAS VEGAS – (Oct. 29, 2007) – American Suzuki Motor Corp. showcases four spirited and dynamic vehicles at the 2007...
11/29/2007 | 22:11 PM
|
|
Suzuki X-HEAD, SXForce Concepts shock at Detroit Auto Show
DETROIT – (Jan. 11, 2008) – After a fourth consecutive year of increasing sales, and more than 100,000 units sold...
01/16/2008 | 17:01 PM
|
|
2008 Suzuki SX4 To Arrive At New York Auto Show
Though the Geneva Motor Show hasn't even started, Suzuki, which has debuted its all-new 2008 Suzuki SX4 for the press,...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
Suzuki XL7 Leads Automaker's Record-Breaking Sales
BREA, Calif. -- (June 1, 2007) -- American Suzuki Motor Corporation (ASMC) today announced sales of 10,190 automobiles...
06/08/2007 | 18:06 PM
|
|
2008 Suzuki Grand Vitara Photo Gallery
This year, Suzuki adds a remote fuel door release, upgraded sound deadening materials and a newly designed climate control head unit. The sunroof becomes a standard feature starting on the XSport Pac...
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|