|
|
|
|
Value Rating
Below Average
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
Road Test: Chevrolet Tahoe LT vs. Dodge Durango vs. Ford Expedition vs. Nissan Armada vs. Toyota Sequoia
Battle Cruisers: In the sea of full-size SUVs, who builds the unsinkable ship?
By Scott Mead
Photography by the author, John Kiewicz, Brian Vance
Full-size sport/utilities: family battle cruisers asked to carry the kids safely to school, take Mom and Dad out for a night on the town, haul bags of lawn seed from the garden-supply center, and tow the family boat on vacations. These big guns have to carry passengers comfortably, convert to gear haulers easily, and be dependable day in and day out. With a few fresh faces and some updated players for 2004, we sent out the call to the world's best to see whose SUV rules the seven seas.
The Fleet
Hitting the water for the first time this year, Nissan's Armada is looking to sink its share of sales. Equipped with the 305-horsepower, 5.6-liter Endurance V-8, the Armada holds high rank in standard horsepower and torque. It's built on an all-new platform that also enables it to claim the highest maximum towing capacity in its class: 9100 pounds. Dodge comes into the war games loaded with a Hemi. The 5.7-liter powerplant boasts an impressive 345 horsepower and 375 pound-feet of torque, which is best-in-class performance. By offering fresh skin and revised suspension tuning, Dodge hopes to outmuscle the competition at dealer showrooms. Back to duke it out again are the Chevy Tahoe, Ford Expedition, and Toyota Sequoia. The Tahoe has received incremental updates since its Gen-2 redesign bowed in 2000, the latest of which includes tire-pressure monitors, Hydroboost brakes, and a seatbelt reminder for the front passenger. Coming off a full redesign last year, Ford's Expedition, the class-leading seller (at over 181,000 units in 2003), doesn't change much for the 2004-model year. Tire-pressure monitoring is now standard on XLT and Eddie Bauer trim levels, and the formerly standard limited-slip diff is now an option. Toyota has a thing for coming late to parties. But when its vehicles show up, they're dressed to the nines and are well-versed on the competition on the dance floor. Such was the case for the Sequoia in 2001. Boasting more interior and cargo room than the Tahoe or Expedition, Toyota's big tree receives sapling upgrades this year: Limited-trim vehicles now come with a sunroof, and the base SR5 is now equipped with rear air-conditioning and power front seats.
|
2008 Nissan Changes - Altima (Sedan), Armada, Pathfinder
2008 Nissan Armada The substantial enhancements to the 2008 Armada include revised exterior styling, an upgraded...
07/02/2007 | 15:07 PM
|
|
2008 Nissan Titan and Armada Get Priced
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (April 24, 2007) -- Nissan today announced pricing on two new 2008 vehicles, the Nissan Titan...
04/26/2007 | 17:04 PM
|
|
2008 Nissan Armada, Pathfinder, Titan To Stomp Chicago
FARMINGTOM HILLS, Mich. (February, 2007) – Nissan North America, Inc. (NNA) previewed last week the new 2008 Nisan...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
Nissan Pathfinder and Armada Get Marc Ecko'd at VIP Show
With SEMA just a few scant weeks away, news on other custom shops are coming out of the garage faster than teens from...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
Nissan prices 2007 SUVs, new Versa
NASHVILLE, Tenn. – Nissan North America, Inc. (NNA) announced this week the 2007 model year pricing for Frontier...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|