|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
Quick Test: 2008 Nissan Armada LE / Photography by Brian Vance /
Article provided by: Motor Trend Magazine
After clipping 0 to 60 in a mere 6.8 seconds and the quarter mile in 15.3 at 88.9 mph, the Nissan Armada conceivably has more horses on-board than the claimed 317. Not only is the Armada, with its 5.6-liter V-8 and five-speed automatic, quick, it's also agile. The Armada consumed the figure eight in a best-in-test 28.8 seconds and the skidpad at a sedanlike 0.76 g. Says editor Edward Loh, "The Armada offers great balance, with great grip and no drama when cornering. It feels like a sports car in comparison -- like a 560Z!" Through our test loop, it exhibited the most confidence-inspiring handling, moves heightened by the organic steering and ergonomically sound interior. "This is a nice cabin ," claims editor-at-large Arthur St. Antoine, adding, "I love the big, clear gauges and controls, the nice matte finish with appealing chrome accents, and the great nav system." When it came time to drop anchor, the Armada shone, again. It needed only 128 feet to erase 60 mph, superior to even its sedan sibling, the Altima 3.5 SE, which required 131 feet in a February 2008 test. Unfortunately, you'll have to drop anchor often for fuel, as it recorded 11.9 mpg during our soiree in the snow. At least its parched Endurance V-8 will drink regular unleaded or E85. Perhaps the Armada's unquenchable thirst was due to its wild time we spent with it in Mammoth's winter wonderland. With a full-time automatic setting, not to mention its sporty chassis, the Nissan was entertaining in the fluff.  In any case, the Armada's handsome body makes it easier to accept its fat fuel fix. "The exterior is tidy -- she hides her weight well," notes Loh. St. Antoine concurs: "I like this exterior -- it's chunky, modern, and sporty, and the big wheels and tires look great." The Nissan's smart styling flows into the interior, too, a space that surprised with its functionality and room. The fold-flat second row not only tumbles forward with the pull of a lever for easy ingress and egress, but also delivers in headroom and legroom, while the third row, which is split 60/40 and can be folded flat, delivers decent measurements. Need to tow a boat? This Armada is capable of adding a 9000-pound vessel to the end of the line. With its athletic handling, strong acceleration, and striking styling, the Nissan makes a strong case for itself in the large SUV arena. ... >>next page
|
2008 Nissan Changes - Altima (Sedan), Armada, Pathfinder
2008 Nissan Armada The substantial enhancements to the 2008 Armada include revised exterior styling, an upgraded...
07/02/2007 | 15:07 PM
|
|
2008 Nissan Titan and Armada Get Priced
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (April 24, 2007) -- Nissan today announced pricing on two new 2008 vehicles, the Nissan Titan...
04/26/2007 | 17:04 PM
|
|
2008 Nissan Armada, Pathfinder, Titan To Stomp Chicago
FARMINGTOM HILLS, Mich. (February, 2007) – Nissan North America, Inc. (NNA) previewed last week the new 2008 Nisan...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
Nissan Pathfinder and Armada Get Marc Ecko'd at VIP Show
With SEMA just a few scant weeks away, news on other custom shops are coming out of the garage faster than teens from...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
Nissan prices 2007 SUVs, new Versa
NASHVILLE, Tenn. – Nissan North America, Inc. (NNA) announced this week the 2007 model year pricing for Frontier...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
2004 Nissan Pathfinder Armada
The all-new Nissan Pathfinder Armada will compete with likes of the Toyota Sequoia, Chevy Tahoe, Ford Expedition, and the new Dodge Durango.
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |