|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
First Drive: 2008 Dodge DakotaMidsize midlife crisis / By Allyson Harwood /
Article provided by: Motor Trend Magazine
Compact and midsize trucks aren't exactly flying off the dealer showroom floor right now. To combat that, Dodge has changed the Dakota's philosophy for 2008 by no longer competing with full-size trucks on every level. The Dakota attempts to carve its own niche by appealing to younger guys with active lifestyles. Dodge added power, refinement, and versatility, and redesigned the exterior and cabin.  Replacing the standard and high-output versions of the old 4.7-liter V-8 is a new 4.7-liter. Its 302 horsepower is 72 greater than the standard version, and its 329 pound-feet of torque is a 13 percent increase. It's also quieter and more refined and even offers five-percent-better fuel economy. The V-8 runs on 87 octane or E85. The manual transmission is no longer available with this engine, though-just a five-speed column-shift automatic. The added horses are certainly welcome in this truck, adding noticeable power off the line. However, it feels like the Dakota also has gained weight, and, while the truck is the only compact/midsize to offer a V-8, its power/weight ratio doesn't feel stellar. The base 3.7-liter V-6 remains basically unchanged, with 210 horsepower and 235 pound-feet, backed by a six-speed manual or four-speed automatic. As before, it's a fine engine around town and driving the truck unloaded, but lethargic when used for hard work. The suspension was revised for the new model as well, with an emphasis placed on handling, in some ways at the expense of the ride. The previous model was floaty, but it did a better job of absorbing bumps and irregularities. The new Dakota is much firmer, and handling has been dramatically improved, but the downside is the loss of the cushier ride it once had. Revisions also mean two- and four-wheel-drive trucks now have the same ride height.  While the truck's ladder frame and fully boxed main rails remain the same for 2008, sheetmetal from the A-pillar forward was revised to make the front end more chiseled, and the hood, grille, front fascia, and headlights now resemble the Nitro's. And each of the six trim levels comes with its own front-end appearance-whether you opt for ST, SXT, SLT, off-road-appearance TRX4, Sport, or Laramie determines the combination of chrome, metal, and color-matched front-fascia pieces. (The more body-color components, the better.) Aerodynamics have been improved in front, and the gaps are tighter. Rear-end changes include the addition of a spoiler. The new look works on this truck, and we wonder why the Nitro received these styling cues before the Dakota. Why didn't Dodge let the established truck lead the new design direction for its compact/midsize vehicle line? ... >>next page
|
2008 Dodge Dakota Great Value At $20,080
Auburn Hills, Mich., Jul 9, 2007 - Dodge announced pricing today for the new 2008 Dodge Dakota, which features six...
07/09/2007 | 15:07 PM
|
|
2008 Dodge Dakota Rolls Out At Chicago Auto Show
Chicago, Feb 7, 2007 - Chrysler Group unveiled this week the new 2008 Dodge Dakota mid-size truck with a new engine...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
Chrysler tempts Consumers to Customize at SEMA
Chrysler LLC Reveals Lineup of ‘Tricked, Tuned and Customized’ Chrysler, Jeep® and Dodge Vehicles for the 2007...
11/29/2007 | 22:11 PM
|
|
Chrysler's "Let’s Refuel America" Cuts the Gas
Chrysler has started a new sales promotion called “Let’s Refuel America,†which offers an incentive for buyers of...
05/07/2008 | 23:05 PM
|
|
Chrysler employees get better deals buying from dealerships
Sadly enough, the company that can least afford huge incentives right now is the one most being forced to use them....
06/04/2008 | 07:06 AM
|
|
Review: 2006 Dodge Dakota
Although it faced off in the marketplace against the Ford Ranger and the Chevrolet S-10, the original Dodge Dakota stretched the definition of "compact pickup" to new dimensions.
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |