Road Test: 2006 Mazda3 S vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix vs. 2007 Dodge Caliber vs. 2006 Chevrolet HHR at Automotive.com
»Locate a Dealer»Find a Used Car»Get Financing

Mid-Size Hatchback Comparison

Below is the Motor Trend magazine article Road Test: 2006 Mazda3 S vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix vs. 2007 Dodge Caliber vs. 2006 Chevrolet HHR read the article, browse photos from the article, or search related articles in the Automotive.com Enthusiast Central.

Road Test: 2006 Mazda3 S vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix vs. 2007 Dodge Caliber vs. 2006 Che...

Midsize Hatchback Comparison: 2006 Mazda3 S vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix vs. 2007 Dodge Caliber vs. 2006 Chevrolet HHR

Rolling Coasters: Will the hatchback formula work in America this time around? / By Greg N. Brown / Photography by Brian Vance / Article provided by: Motor Trend Magazine

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Community Comments
No one has commented on this article yet. Why not be the first to leave a comment?

Add a Comment (Must Be Registered)

User Name
Not Registered? Signup Here
Password
Comment
   (1024 character limit)

RELATED

 Preview Mazda's 2007 offerings
Preview Mazda's 2007 offerings
Mazda recently released some details of its upcoming line for 2007: the new CX-9, the hard-top MX-5 (formerly known as...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
 Mazda CX-7, CX-9 Crossovers are NHTSA All-Stars
Mazda CX-7, CX-9 Crossovers are NHTSA All-Stars
IRVINE, Calif. -- An SUV with Zoom-Zoom and protection. The Mazda CX-9 and CX-7 sport utility vehicles (SUV) recently...
09/03/2007 | 15:09 PM
 2007 Cars of the Year
2007 Cars of the Year
The editors of Edmunds.com recently selected a list of their favorite cars....
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
 Suzuki SX4: Best Small SUV For The Money
Suzuki SX4: Best Small SUV For The Money
In the “small car with big carrying capacity” category, recent notables include the Honda Fit, the Toyota Yaris,...
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
 SUVs, Like the Dinosaurs, Meet their Compact Comet
SUVs, Like the Dinosaurs, Meet their Compact Comet
“Hit the road jack, and don’t you come back no more, no more, no more, no more.” While that line was originally...
06/11/2008 | 20:06 PM