|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article From Motor Trend Magazine
New Car Buyer's Guide
Mitsubishi MirageMitsubishi's entry-level car was on the verge of living up to its name until a complete rework for '97 saved it from fading into obscurity. Though little is new for '98, last season's redraft was so extensive it's well worth recapping. By reworking the body structure and going after noise with a vengeance, Mitsubishi engineers were able to net substantial reductions in interior racket. They also revamped steering and suspension to improve ride and inject more fun into the handling. Styling-inside and out-was boldly redrawn, too. Base level DE coupes and sedans have 1.5-liter/92-horsepower inline-four engines, while the uplevel LS versions have sportier 1.8-liter/113-horsepower engines. | Body type: | Coupe, sedan | | Drivetrain: | Front engine, front drive | | Airbag: | Driver/passenger | | Base curb weight, lb: | 2127 | | Base engine: | 1.5-liter I-4, SOHC, 92 hp | | Opt. engine: | 1.8-liter I-4, SOHC, 113/111 hp, 49 state/Cal. | | Brakes, f/r: | Discs/drums, ABS opt. | | Price range: | $11,500-$15,000 | | Fuel economy, city/hwy, mpg: | 33/40 | Nissan 200SXReal estate values in California have just jumped sharply in response to the news that the highly entertaining Nissan 200SX SE-R will be back on sale in the Golden State for '98. After an emissions-related hiatus last year, this dynamic sport coupe once again wears the tailpipe-sniffer's seal of approval. And there's more: All 200SX models benefit from new front and rear styling licks, highlighted by a trio of new colors. The base model gets larger 14-inch wheels and an upgraded interior, too. Standard motivation comes in the form of a 1.6-liter/115-horsepower inline four; sign up for the SE-R, and you'll thrill to a free-revving 2.0-liter/140-horsepower inline four and juicy handling upgrades. | Body type: | Coupe | | Drivetrain: | Front engine, front drive | | Airbag: | Driver/passenger | | Base curb weight, lb: | 2330 | | Base engine: | 1.6-liter I-4, DOHC, 115 hp | | Opt. engine: | 2.0-liter I-4, DOHC, 140 hp | | Brakes, f/r: | Discs/drums, ABS opt. | | Price range: | $14,000-$18,500 | | Fuel economy, city/hwy, mpg: | 30/40 | Nissan 240SXAs the sole remaining rear-drive coupe in the Nissan line, the 240SX carries on the grand Z-car tradition-with a luxury personal coupe twist. Over time, the 240 has gotten softer, cushier, and more sophisticated. Fully independent suspension and Nissan's design expertise bless the car with precise handling and deliver great seat-of-the-pants sensations on twisty roads, but other more focused sports cars have higher handling limits. Likewise on the powertrain side. The 2.4-liter/155-horsepower inline four is smooth (considering that it's big for a four) and torquey, but at about 8 seconds 0-60 mph, it's only moderately fleet of foot. Handsome styling inside and out advance the 240SX's personal luxury mission.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Next
|
|
|
|
|