To be fair, a lot of people choose 2WD over 4WD in an SUV for very good reasons. There's less weight, less mechanical complexity, and often better fuel economy. Plus, two-wheel drive will take a vehicle a lot further in off-pavement conditions than many people realize. Just ask Mac. So, when do you need the extra insurance of 4WD? That's what we aimed to find out by jumping into terrain where the going gets really tough.
Our first test pitting four-wheel drive against two-wheel drive was at the Sluice Box. The Durango inched its way in ankle-deep in boulders. Its four-wheel drive enabled it to claw slowly at approaching rocks with the front tires as they eased under the vehicle. What ultimately limited a completely clean run through the course was its minimum ground clearance of 7.9 inches. Though it's an adequate amount of clearance for most situations, we'd occasionally hear disturbing thumps from various parts of the undercarriage contacting rocks. It was a slow and methodical task with a spotter guiding the driver-not a walk in the park-but it made it. The Explorer, on the other hand, had only to put all four tires in the rocky mess and it hung up on the side-step rail and began to spin a rear wheel-it was stuck. We tried to rock it loose in reverse, to wiggle the steering to get around the rock impeding our forward progress, but it was no use. It's a good thing we had a tow strap to pull out the stranded 'ute with the Durango, otherwise we would've had to call a tow truck (not an easy thing to do when you're hundreds of miles in the outback). DeMere was beginning to change his story when he said, "I'm genuinely surprised. I thought it'd make it."
Next up was the Boulder Climb. With a nasty, deep dip right at the beginning of the wall, the vehicles' approach angles would determine their success here. It turned out neither truck was sufficiently endowed with the necessary 30-degree or so approach angle to clear the bottom, but even a sideways attack mid-way up confounded the Explorer. It wasn't able boost itself up from the dirt on the side to the slightly higher cement, again spinning a rear wheel in protest. Not so with the Durango. It didn't seem to even notice the differences in surface height and available traction. It handily made its way to the top and only slightly scuffed its belly as it crested the peak-a testament to the Durango's 19-degree ramp breakover angle. Not so surprisingly, both the Explorer and the Durango made short work of the same incline rendered in smooth, hard-packed dirt beside the cement version, however the 4x2 Explorer required some rear-wheel spin (absent in the 4x4 Durango) to ascend the hill.
Finally, we ventured to the Frame Twister to test the maximum suspension articulation and balance of the trucks. Though it sometimes felt like a very slow roller-coaster ride with various wheels dangling in mid-air, the Durango tip-toed across the high-wire act with nary a squeak or groan. About halfway into the exercise, however, the Explorer found itself completely out of suspension travel and available traction. With its right-rear wheel buried deep in its wheelwell and the left-rear wheel 4 feet from terra firma, it was going nowhere, fast. Again, we had to carefully retrace our tire tracks in reverse to extract the Explorer from its precarious perch.