|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Motor Trend Magazine
Archive: The Challenge ContinuesRinging out the new Dodge musclecar, circa 1970 / By Matt Stone / photographer: Motor Trend Archive /
Article provided by: Motor Trend Magazine
We're mighty pleased that, 38 years after the zenith of the musclecar era, we can still put a hot new Dodge and a thundering Mustang on the cover of Motor Trend. Here are a few snaps from our 1970 visit to the dragstrip in the original Dodge Challenger. This was a nicely equipped car, too, an R/T with a 440 Six-Pack, vinyl roof, and tacky luggage rack. It would be worth solid money today. We can't tell from these black and white pix what color it was, but we're guessing it was Plum Crazy, that wonderful 1970s shade of purple so popular on Mopars of the day. The 20081/2 Challenger SRT8 outperforms the old classic in every way possible, but couldn't improve on the original look. The proportions, overhangs, and dash-to-axle ratios were so much different then. Will there be a convertible version of the new one? TBD. Will we see those great 1970s colors again on future hot-rod Dodges? "Count on it" says one insider. Luggage racks and vinyl tops? Let's hope not. Coverage August 1979
Three decades past, the talk of the day, much as it is now, was diesels. We tested eight of the current crop. The best mileage-maker was the Volkswagen Rabbit five-speed, which delivered 41.8 mpg on MT's 600 test drive. The worst was the Olds Cutlass 260 diesel, which could only manage 21.4. It also could manage to get from 0-to-60 mph in only a Paleolithic 20.0 seconds-and it wasn't even the slowest of the pack.
|
Dodge Challenger Mopar Package To Debut at Mile-High
Center Line, Mich., Jul 7, 2008 - This year marks the 40th anniversary of the factory-built drag race package cars...
07/08/2008 | 23:07 PM
|
|
Governor Schwarzenegger Drives Dodge Challenger
The Governator with a Dodge Challenger So what? Indeed. "...
07/08/2008 | 00:07 AM
|
|
2009 Dodge Challenger: Retro Musclecar at $21,995
Auburn Hills, Mich., Jun 9, 2008 - Dodge announced pricing today for the all-new 2009 Dodge Challenger. The U.S....
06/09/2008 | 23:06 PM
|
|
2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8 sold for $400,000!
Auburn Hills, Mich., Jan, 2008 - Dodge and notMYkid partnered to auction the first production 2008 Dodge Challenger...
01/29/2008 | 17:01 PM
|
|
2008 Dodge Challenger To Benefit Charities
Auburn Hills, Mich., Sep 17, 2007 - Bidders get ready....
09/17/2007 | 14:09 PM
|
|
|
|
| |